Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

This actually make me angry to see how you faggots are actually falling for this semantic decision. What happened; Race can not be used as the primary, deciding factor in admission. For example

Then;

Black applicant

Oh we'll move him on to the next pile of candidates / just accept the groid

vs

White applicant

Nah denied

That can't happen.

Now;

Oh this applicant experienced great racial prejudice and trauma through his life but overcame it? And he happens to be black? MOVE ON!

vs

Oh this applicant experienced great racial prejudice and trauma through his life but overcame it? And he happens to be White? DENIED!

or

Oh this applicant did not experience racial prejudice and trauma through his life and is White? DENIED!

That can happen. I am really annoyed that any of you fell for this semantic judaism. I know, for a fact, that I've taught you all so much better. You're all clearly diversity hires.

.

This actually make me angry to see how you faggots are actually falling for this semantic decision. What happened; Race can not be used as the primary, deciding factor in admission. For example #**Then;** >Black applicant >>Oh we'll move him on to the next pile of candidates / just accept the groid **vs** >White applicant >>Nah denied That can't happen. #**Now;** >Oh this applicant experienced great racial prejudice and trauma through his life but overcame it? And he happens to be black? MOVE ON! **vs** >Oh this applicant experienced great racial prejudice and trauma through his life but overcame it? And he happens to be White? DENIED! or >Oh this applicant did not experience racial prejudice and trauma through his life and is White? DENIED! That can happen. I am really annoyed that any of you fell for this semantic judaism. I know, for a fact, that I've taught you all so much better. You're all clearly diversity hires. [Affirmative Action was totally struck down goyim](https://pic8.co/sh/50QrKj.jpg).

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (26).
[–] • 0 pt

Agree it's mostly election year fodder. Interesting that it opens the door for other factors to deny or determine admission. Like some "adversity index" nonsense that can be sold by a consulting agency

[–] • 1 pt

I'm Surprised it didnt mention anything about 'implementing a framework seeking to equitably address vulnerable at risk groups negatively impacted by climate change' - maybe thats for next year closer to selection time.