I think you've got it backwards. Using their words doesn't help you in any way.
I think you've got it backwards. Using their words doesn't help you in any way.
It's so obvious. All of you wearing underwear are conforming to the tranny agenda by tucking your dick away.
The tranny thing and also seem like tip-of-the-spear phenomena but they are really just continuations of a de-masculisation process that has plagued humanity ever since the dawn of industrial society. The explosion of textile manufacturing and its self-promotion via "marketing" gave rise to the need for new products. One of them, male underwear, has the function of padding the area around your genitals and tucking away your masculinity.
Requiring undergarments for females, of course, makes sense for a number of reasons. In fact, the need for this is most likely where the concept originated. All the more laughable, then, that "modern men" are saddled with this "necessity".
Besides the obviously humiliating nature of this, underwear isn't good for your nads. Like so many "conveniences" of industrial society - microplastics, porn, "vegetable" oil, refined sugar and corn syrup - it just so conveniently happens to be a direct affront to male biology. You pay a lot of money for this privilege, too.
So what's the purpose for it, then, if the cost of it is lowering your sperm count and testosterone levels? What is the benefit?
You could argue hiding your dick is good. Oh, maybe it would make some woman in the workplace feel uncomfortable if she could see your rod swinging around in the left leg of your slacks. Everyone should be considerate, right?
Better just tuck it away and admit industrial society has made you its bitch.
What a humiliation so many men endure.
It's so obvious. All of you wearing underwear are conforming to the tranny agenda by tucking your dick away.
The tranny thing and also [heterosexual tucking](/s/tucking) seem like tip-of-the-spear phenomena but they are really just continuations of a de-masculisation process that has plagued humanity ever since the dawn of industrial society. The explosion of textile manufacturing and its self-promotion via "marketing" gave rise to the need for new products. One of them, male underwear, has the function of padding the area around your genitals and tucking away your masculinity.
Requiring undergarments for females, of course, makes sense for a number of reasons. In fact, the need for this is most likely where the concept originated. All the more laughable, then, that "modern men" are saddled with this "necessity".
Besides the obviously humiliating nature of this, underwear isn't good for your nads. Like so many "conveniences" of industrial society - microplastics, porn, "vegetable" oil, refined sugar and corn syrup - it just so *conveniently happens* to be a direct affront to male biology. You pay a lot of money for this privilege, too.
So what's the purpose for it, then, if the cost of it is lowering your sperm count and testosterone levels? What is the benefit?
You could argue hiding your dick is *good*. Oh, maybe it would make some *woman in the workplace* feel uncomfortable if she could see your rod swinging around in the left leg of your slacks. Everyone should be considerate, right?
Better just tuck it away and admit industrial society has made you its bitch.
What a humiliation so many men endure.
(post is archived)