>Notice he won't just plainly say what he thinks. He sees their side is losing ground on the point of underwear being tucking and switches to their only other viable response - insults. I plainly said you are gay for thinking about men's dicks. That's what I think. But if you insist, I believe it is for each man to choose for themselves whether they wear underwear or not. Your interpretation is juvenile and simplistic because it does not take into account the multitude of variables each man faces in his choice of clothing for his line of work or lifestyle. You make an assertion that is a dichotomy when the the reality of the situation cannot be boiled down to only two options. You gave women wearing underwear a pass without explaining how it benefits them, but you also failed to realize that there are also benefits to men wearing the types of garments they choose. Why you have so much concern for what is inside a man's pants is beyond me. You are just coming off as either gay or a concern troll here. >He doesn't want to think about what he's done to his testosterone levels or sperm count by wearing underwear all these years. Why are you assuming I wear underwear? >So like a woman he uses emotiveness to try to shift focus to something insubstantive. I called you gay. Like a woman you are reading into that statement many things that were not said at all. You're just cunt-hurt that I called you gay instead of playing along with your men's underwear fetish. Show me where in my first comment I say anything at all about underwear. You can't do it because it's not there and you then resorted to insulting me. You did what you accuse me of. How very (((gay))) of you.