Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

767

Is that it enables the worst among us, those dull, uncreative, tyrannical little men we call bureaucrats to make what looks like art.

That's the real purpose of the entire AI industry, to remove the obstacle of creative, talented and dedicated people from between the worst people and what they want. No brave soldiers to refuse orders from warmongers, no artists to question propagandists, no workers to slow down the worst corporations, no whistleblowers anywhere. That's the dystopia we're heading for. All thanks to the biggest bootlickers, programmers. (Except you , you're the good one.)

Is that it enables the worst among us, those dull, uncreative, tyrannical little men we call bureaucrats to make what looks like art. That's the real purpose of the entire AI industry, to remove the obstacle of creative, talented and dedicated people from between the worst people and what they want. No brave soldiers to refuse orders from warmongers, no artists to question propagandists, no workers to slow down the worst corporations, no whistleblowers anywhere. That's the dystopia we're heading for. All thanks to the biggest bootlickers, programmers. (Except you @AOU, you're the good one.)

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (15).
[–] • 1 pt

It proves that art, at least the kind of art it produces, is pointless.

It proves that art can be reduced to mathematics. But so can everything else.

Don't like it? Make your own art that's better. Oh, you can't.

Technically better, no. I can barely outdraw Dall-e mini, much less the newer stuff. Better is subjective though. Some people would consider any art made by a person to be better because it can communicate something, rather than being an empty product of an algorithm trained on billions of images, probably including a few terabytes of furry porn.