WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

Well, let me start by stating by democracy I mean full or nearly full democracy like what we have in the USA and other European-populated nations. If everyone is allowed to vote and contribute to governance, then you will always have the liberal element being input into the system. I tend to understand right-wing or conservative politics as being up and liberals and leftists as being down. The thing that defines any left-wing movement is the removal of boundaries and standards. On the other hand, conservatives and anything right-wing wants to increase or maintain boundaries and standards. Even if the goal is maintenance it is like holding a weight in place (it takes upwards force to do so).

So if my goal is to lift 200 lbs (a lot for me as a skinny guy) and some short, skinny, blue-haired, liberal cunt is trying to prevent me from doing so, I guarantee you she's going to win. She's going to win, because her task is way easier than mine. So this puts me in a position where I have to completely take her out of the picture in order to lift that weight. If she is allowed free reign to exercise her will, I will always lose.

Any government that wishes to be successful must completely remove the liberal/leftist influence or whether it be quickly or slowly, the government and the society will be degraded. The only time such an influence is good is if a government is too strict and too severe. Yes, we should probably tone things done then.

Ultimately, in the USA they have created a class of morons who give heed to anything leftist. They ban us and remove us from their platforms in order to protect them from us. This makes it so that if we wish to fight back, then we end up having to fight against a mass of morons who will defend the system and the government they think is good.

When I consider the Amish, I think of them as a group that has kept the liberal/leftist influence out. Ultimately, the most important part is keeping out the Jewish media that degrades people's morals and feeds them various lies. They are the ones that declared it to be unfair that women can't vote and started trying to convince women that they should be LARPing as men. I suppose another aspect of Amish society is that things also suck bad enough to prevent any fat, weak, soft, lazy leftist from wanting to be there.

Well, let me start by stating by democracy I mean full or nearly full democracy like what we have in the USA and other European-populated nations. If everyone is allowed to vote and contribute to governance, then you will always have the liberal element being input into the system. I tend to understand right-wing or conservative politics as being up and liberals and leftists as being down. The thing that defines any left-wing movement is the removal of boundaries and standards. On the other hand, conservatives and anything right-wing wants to increase or maintain boundaries and standards. Even if the goal is maintenance it is like holding a weight in place (it takes upwards force to do so). So if my goal is to lift 200 lbs (a lot for me as a skinny guy) and some short, skinny, blue-haired, liberal cunt is trying to prevent me from doing so, I guarantee you she's going to win. She's going to win, because her task is way easier than mine. So this puts me in a position where I have to completely take her out of the picture in order to lift that weight. If she is allowed free reign to exercise her will, I will always lose. Any government that wishes to be successful must completely remove the liberal/leftist influence or whether it be quickly or slowly, the government and the society will be degraded. The only time such an influence is good is if a government is too strict and too severe. Yes, we should probably tone things done then. Ultimately, in the USA they have created a class of morons who give heed to anything leftist. They ban us and remove us from their platforms in order to protect them from us. This makes it so that if we wish to fight back, then we end up having to fight against a mass of morons who will defend the system and the government they think is good. When I consider the Amish, I think of them as a group that has kept the liberal/leftist influence out. Ultimately, the most important part is keeping out the Jewish media that degrades people's morals and feeds them various lies. They are the ones that declared it to be unfair that women can't vote and started trying to convince women that they should be LARPing as men. I suppose another aspect of Amish society is that things also suck bad enough to prevent any fat, weak, soft, lazy leftist from wanting to be there.

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

Democracy, leftism, liberalism = jews.

jews are the real enemy. EVERYTHING that's wrong with our society can be one way or another attributed to them, because they are using our own governments against us in order to stop us from solving any problems in our societies.

Make jews go away, and you would be surprised how quickly and easily all our current problems which seem unsolvable will be solved.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

I am thinking of China where they didn't have a Jew problem. Their empires would fall apart. I looked into the end of the Han. The problem there was that the emperors would end up being too young to rule. So then they'd have Eunuchs and dowagers (often women) running things instead. The lack of testicles in leadership led to all kinds of corruption problems arising. Eventually, there was something called the Yellow Turban Rebellion and a dictator called Dong Zhuo seizing power. Then Cao Cao took over the largest portion of the country and the restoration of order and unity came through his faction. Their system had a problem with lineage determining who was ruler instead of competence. They insisted the first born inherit the throne instead of having the most competent son. The Europeans had a similar problem. It would be nice if we could have a king or emperor but then have him replaced by someone who is also of great competence.