Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

Well, let me start by stating by democracy I mean full or nearly full democracy like what we have in the USA and other European-populated nations. If everyone is allowed to vote and contribute to governance, then you will always have the liberal element being input into the system. I tend to understand right-wing or conservative politics as being up and liberals and leftists as being down. The thing that defines any left-wing movement is the removal of boundaries and standards. On the other hand, conservatives and anything right-wing wants to increase or maintain boundaries and standards. Even if the goal is maintenance it is like holding a weight in place (it takes upwards force to do so).

So if my goal is to lift 200 lbs (a lot for me as a skinny guy) and some short, skinny, blue-haired, liberal cunt is trying to prevent me from doing so, I guarantee you she's going to win. She's going to win, because her task is way easier than mine. So this puts me in a position where I have to completely take her out of the picture in order to lift that weight. If she is allowed free reign to exercise her will, I will always lose.

Any government that wishes to be successful must completely remove the liberal/leftist influence or whether it be quickly or slowly, the government and the society will be degraded. The only time such an influence is good is if a government is too strict and too severe. Yes, we should probably tone things done then.

Ultimately, in the USA they have created a class of morons who give heed to anything leftist. They ban us and remove us from their platforms in order to protect them from us. This makes it so that if we wish to fight back, then we end up having to fight against a mass of morons who will defend the system and the government they think is good.

When I consider the Amish, I think of them as a group that has kept the liberal/leftist influence out. Ultimately, the most important part is keeping out the Jewish media that degrades people's morals and feeds them various lies. They are the ones that declared it to be unfair that women can't vote and started trying to convince women that they should be LARPing as men. I suppose another aspect of Amish society is that things also suck bad enough to prevent any fat, weak, soft, lazy leftist from wanting to be there.

Well, let me start by stating by democracy I mean full or nearly full democracy like what we have in the USA and other European-populated nations. If everyone is allowed to vote and contribute to governance, then you will always have the liberal element being input into the system. I tend to understand right-wing or conservative politics as being up and liberals and leftists as being down. The thing that defines any left-wing movement is the removal of boundaries and standards. On the other hand, conservatives and anything right-wing wants to increase or maintain boundaries and standards. Even if the goal is maintenance it is like holding a weight in place (it takes upwards force to do so). So if my goal is to lift 200 lbs (a lot for me as a skinny guy) and some short, skinny, blue-haired, liberal cunt is trying to prevent me from doing so, I guarantee you she's going to win. She's going to win, because her task is way easier than mine. So this puts me in a position where I have to completely take her out of the picture in order to lift that weight. If she is allowed free reign to exercise her will, I will always lose. Any government that wishes to be successful must completely remove the liberal/leftist influence or whether it be quickly or slowly, the government and the society will be degraded. The only time such an influence is good is if a government is too strict and too severe. Yes, we should probably tone things done then. Ultimately, in the USA they have created a class of morons who give heed to anything leftist. They ban us and remove us from their platforms in order to protect them from us. This makes it so that if we wish to fight back, then we end up having to fight against a mass of morons who will defend the system and the government they think is good. When I consider the Amish, I think of them as a group that has kept the liberal/leftist influence out. Ultimately, the most important part is keeping out the Jewish media that degrades people's morals and feeds them various lies. They are the ones that declared it to be unfair that women can't vote and started trying to convince women that they should be LARPing as men. I suppose another aspect of Amish society is that things also suck bad enough to prevent any fat, weak, soft, lazy leftist from wanting to be there.

(post is archived)

[–] • 2 pts

Democracy, leftism, liberalism = jews.

jews are the real enemy. EVERYTHING that's wrong with our society can be one way or another attributed to them, because they are using our own governments against us in order to stop us from solving any problems in our societies.

Make jews go away, and you would be surprised how quickly and easily all our current problems which seem unsolvable will be solved.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

I am thinking of China where they didn't have a Jew problem. Their empires would fall apart. I looked into the end of the Han. The problem there was that the emperors would end up being too young to rule. So then they'd have Eunuchs and dowagers (often women) running things instead. The lack of testicles in leadership led to all kinds of corruption problems arising. Eventually, there was something called the Yellow Turban Rebellion and a dictator called Dong Zhuo seizing power. Then Cao Cao took over the largest portion of the country and the restoration of order and unity came through his faction. Their system had a problem with lineage determining who was ruler instead of competence. They insisted the first born inherit the throne instead of having the most competent son. The Europeans had a similar problem. It would be nice if we could have a king or emperor but then have him replaced by someone who is also of great competence.

[–] • 2 pts

Any society will fail eventually. We are not a democracy btw. We are a banana republic at the moment. But our constitution clearly explains we are a representative republic. Not a fucking democracy. And doesn’t matter what you are if there’s always deceitful rats that climb and destroy from within. The healthiest body that doesn’t fight the cancer will eventually die.

[–] • 0 pt

We are a democratic-republic, and that accurately expresses the people voting on representatives. That is how it works. The founders were smart enough to limit the voting to land-owning men of the European type. Eventually this was degraded to include everyone. I'm sure Jews were all over this degradation.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

All systems fail eventually

[–] • 1 pt

I was gonna try to refute you, but then I remembered entropy...

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Because it turns into a tyranny of the minority. Some kike tried to argue against this as though "tyranny of the majority" was a thing in democracy. Ignoring the fact that "tyranny of the majority" is quite literally the stated point of (((democracy))).

So if my goal is to lift 200 lbs (a lot for me as a skinny guy) ...

Depends, which lift, what's your weight and height?

... and some short, skinny, blue-haired, liberal cunt is trying to prevent me from doing so, I guarantee you she's going to win. She's going to win, because her task is way easier than mine. So this puts me in a position where I have to completely take her out of the picture in order to lift that weight. If she is allowed free reign to exercise her will, I will always lose.

You give up way too easily and your analogy is extremely poor. To explain the weak point isn't that muh ebil leftist stops you from achieving your goal, that's 100% on you. The fault is that everyone knows somebody who fits into some "oppressed group", however small that group at this time is, everyone know someone in this current group or a different one that's already been catered toward.

What happens with this is when these new "oppressed group" is in the limelight as such they and the (((media))) will guilt trip you and everyone into caring for / about that group, whether you do or likely do not care about that group, just that individual. They will be weaponized against you for their time, effort and "care". These groups are a small and essentially by the number insignificant part of the population. But everyone knows one. And cliques, groups, "cults" start forming around them to make noise.

This fake increase in the "oppressed groups'" numbers causes it to be claimed that they account for a far, far, far higher percentage of the whole than in reality. Voting then "happens" to cater to, prop up, finance, w/e that group.

This is tyranny of the minority. We saw it with fags, trannies, spics (when they were but 1% of the US and even then illegally) niggers, sand kikes, kikes (cosntantly) etc.

Your analogy hits none of the above, hits none of how (((democracy))) is used - tyranny of the minority - and I'm not sure how you got to any part of your post.

[–] • 0 pt

I have done 200 lbs or more on a deadlift and on a calf machine. I was far from it on the bench press when I was lifting weights.

Well, the tyranny of the minority thing is based in media control. Who is controlling the media and ultimately using the minority groups for destruction. Gypsies existed in Europe for centuries. They were beggars and thieves, but they never had subversive power. They didn't even have the sense to try to engage in such behavior. It is a crooked (((media))) that did it.

[–] • 0 pt

Why do you avoid saying "jew"?