Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

636

Its a "good prognosis" type. And my mom is trying to talk her out of doing chemo poison treatment after the surgery.. as the (((doctors))) are going to tell her its "recommended"...

But that would require her to be able to distrust in the "science monster". And i doubt that. She has three kids and just got divorced.. I'm afraid its a sad time ahead..

Its a "good prognosis" type. And my mom is trying to talk her out of doing chemo poison treatment after the surgery.. as the (((doctors))) are going to tell her its "recommended"... But that would require her to be able to distrust in the "science monster". And i doubt that. She has three kids and just got divorced.. I'm afraid its a sad time ahead..

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (33).
[–] • 0 pt

Interesting. It sounds like the prudent thing is to get a second diagnosis and ask if the cancer is highly malignant or relatively benign.

[–] • 2 pts

Yeah, depending on the type of cancer, you might be able to monitor it and if it's not growing or spreading, then doing nothing may be a better option. That being said, I wouldn't act based on my advice, but getting a second opinion from a trained specialist would be advisable.

There is a perverse interest in the cancer treatment industry though, to treat non-threatening cancers, since the "survival rate" of those (other than people who die from the treatment) is very high. That makes the treatment look much better than it really is.