Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

460

Its a "good prognosis" type. And my mom is trying to talk her out of doing chemo poison treatment after the surgery.. as the (((doctors))) are going to tell her its "recommended"...

But that would require her to be able to distrust in the "science monster". And i doubt that. She has three kids and just got divorced.. I'm afraid its a sad time ahead..

Its a "good prognosis" type. And my mom is trying to talk her out of doing chemo poison treatment after the surgery.. as the (((doctors))) are going to tell her its "recommended"... But that would require her to be able to distrust in the "science monster". And i doubt that. She has three kids and just got divorced.. I'm afraid its a sad time ahead..

(post is archived)

[–] • 7 pts
[–] • 6 pts

Thank you brother, I can use this. btw your post about white history, the asha logos post, has given me so much. I am on my second listen through. Just legendary work on that one. Have a blessed day.

[–] • 4 pts

You might have heard of that dancing, violin-playing girl called Lindsey Stirling. She had a keyboard player called Gavi who went through chemo. He was in his twenties and relatively healthy outside of cancer. After chemo and recovering he ended up dying of a heart problem caused by the chemo.

[–] • 2 pts

I like Lindsey Stirling, that's sad to hear.

[–] • 3 pts

Gavi was her best friend. They were doing a lot of touring together. I didn't know about the cancer when he was still alive. I just got the whole story all at once late one night after coming in from a friend's house.

[–] • 1 pt

The last link is obfuscated.

[–] • 1 pt

It's not new information, It's just what I've save. I haven't had to go through a loved one getting cancer so I don't research, add and update for relevance.

[–] • 4 pts

I posted asking for help for my niece a while back. You can find the post and some great info here.

https://poal.co/s/AskPoal/580299

What I haven't done since then is give an update. I was saving that until she's fully cured, but my niece went from having nodes all over to only 2. We began treating her with RSO (Rick Simpson Oil). Doctors don't know what to say. They had already written her off to die. Thanks to the niggerfaggots here we learned of RSO. It works.

The main concern I would see with your sister's cancer is that if it's vaccine induced then it may be an issue. Only time will tell, but I will put y'all in my prayers.

[–] • 2 pts

Yep, I have heard plenty of live interviews with him. There is a reason the Canadian government threatened to throw him in jail forever, it works.

[–] • 0 pt

Where do you get the RSO?

[–] • 1 pt

We got it at a dispensary. Not all dispensaries have it. You'll need to do some research and get the most potent you can

[–] • 3 pts

Two words.

Brzynski Clinic.

[–] • 0 pt

No where does it give a cost. That makes it seem jewey.

[–] • 1 pt

It's urine therapy. You piss out the key ingredients, and he processes it out of the urine and I believe injected into you. Doesn't cure everyone, but it does cure a lot.

[–] • 3 pts (edited )

My buddy had cancer. He looked horrible from the cancer causing blood loss, etc.

After surgery where they removed 7 inches of colon, he looked great. He was doing really well for 3 months until the doctor convinced him to do chemo becuase there was a 30% chance of the cancer returning. I said take the chance, you are cancer free at the moment and your labs are good.

He said no, I have my kids to think about. He started chemo in month 5 post op, still with good lab reports. 3 rounds of chemo later , he was dead.

[–] • 0 pt

The big study from 2000-2012 Showed 25% were killed by the first round of chemo "treatment"

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

I think you should worry more about her kids than her.

[–] • 0 pt

Yeah, getting them back to their father is the most important thing.

[–] • 2 pts

Get a second opinion from a cancer center that doesn't hand chemo therapy out like candy and advertises their recovery rate.

[–] • 2 pts

The "recovery rate" for cancer is another fraught area. As more and more screening is being conducted, they are picking up cancers that are smaller and much less rapidly growing. Basically, there are three categories of cancer: turbo-cancer that grows so fast that by the time you find it you're basically going to die in a year or so, treatment does little to nothing for this, normal speed cancer, which grows at a steady pace and is responsive to treatment, and slow cancer, which grows so slowly that you're likely to die of old age before it ever becomes a problem. Treatment for this type of cancer is pointless and the side effects of the treatment are often much worse than the cancer itself.

Screening increases the detection of the last two categories. But, the mortality rate from the last category is very low. The issue is that there is no differentiation of these categories of cancer in the mortality figures, so the very slow growing cancers artificially increase the 5 year survival statistics.

There's an interesting book on this, called Overdiagnosed, which goes into how the over use of screening tests is leading to unnecessary treatment for diseases, including cancer, that is resulting in an overall increase in all cause mortality. Effectively, they are treating people with drugs that might be appropriate if the condition they had was life threatening, but they really don't have a life threatening condition. So the iatrogenic harms are felt, but there is no benefit.

[–] • 0 pt

Interesting. It sounds like the prudent thing is to get a second diagnosis and ask if the cancer is highly malignant or relatively benign.

[–] • 2 pts

Yeah, depending on the type of cancer, you might be able to monitor it and if it's not growing or spreading, then doing nothing may be a better option. That being said, I wouldn't act based on my advice, but getting a second opinion from a trained specialist would be advisable.

There is a perverse interest in the cancer treatment industry though, to treat non-threatening cancers, since the "survival rate" of those (other than people who die from the treatment) is very high. That makes the treatment look much better than it really is.

[–] • 2 pts

I'm afraid that this is going to become a more and more common story. I now know of several people, all relatively young, who have come down with cancer in the last couple of years.

Just be thankful it isn't turbo-cancer that would rip through her in a matter of months.

I don't know, however, if this will be fixable. It is entirely possible that the spike mRNA has been reverse transcribed into her DNA and will be produced for the rest of her life, making her susceptible to cancer and other ailments permanently. Has she tried Ivermectin, or other protease inhibitors? Obviously, it's not going to cure her current cancer, but it might be something to think about longer term.

[–] • 1 pt

Cancer is never perfectly clear. I do believe the shots contribute to or cause it, but it can be dismissed so easily. Honestly, I don't know for sure.

[–] • 1 pt

I have a friend who beat cancer over a decade ago, and friend got the shots...this year friend has turbo cancer all over and is in and out of MD Anderson. No refunds.

[–] • 1 pt

I can't add anything positive to this other than my condolences.

Load more (1 reply)