Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

999

. The reddit thread: www reddit com/r/ParlerWatch/comments/woih93/discussion_on_poalco_about_the_fbi_doxxing_by/ .

How is gab involved? The agents (2) brought a dossier about me with respect to this specific post. Investigating if I was actually a threat - because they even said: it wasn't a threat of violence and wasn't arrestable they still got sent out 7 months later to see. But in that dossier were multiple SSs of the post, my "about me" details and a few SSs from gab, as well as my post here sharing Uncle Ted's book, and my gab post about Asha Logos.

So there are 3 websites involved right now. Poal, reddit and gab. I've been at 's neck prior to this because I had not known gab was involved until the meeting. If you know how a search warrant works you know it requires a subpoena from the police agency about the location (website) to be searched to be granted via the courts. What this means is that (((gab))) is sharing IPs with glowies due to posts on completely different website of users they have ZERO way of knowing are the same

OR

gab is operated by glowniggers.

https://gab.com/anticlutch/posts/109960687232283575

e; Some of you are absolute retards who think I just shared and divulged info to glowniggers without a lawyer present, go dilate with and an hero.

[The poal comment](https://iili.io/HWnMjQ1.jpg). The reddit thread: www reddit com/r/ParlerWatch/comments/woih93/discussion_on_poalco_about_the_fbi_doxxing_by/ [The reddit comment stating I was reported to the FBI](https://iili.io/HWnUuzg.png). How is gab involved? The agents (2) brought a dossier about me with respect to this specific post. Investigating if I was actually a threat - because they even said: it wasn't a threat of violence and wasn't arrestable they still got sent out 7 months later to see. But in that dossier were multiple SSs of the post, my "about me" details and a few SSs from gab, as well as my post here sharing Uncle Ted's book, and my gab post about Asha Logos. So there are 3 websites involved right now. Poal, reddit and gab. I've been at @AOU's neck prior to this because I had not known gab was involved until the meeting. If you know how a search warrant works you know it requires a subpoena from the police agency about the location (website) to be searched to be granted via the courts. What this means is that (((gab))) is sharing IPs with glowies due to posts on completely different website of users they have ZERO way of knowing are the same #**OR** gab is operated by glowniggers. https://gab.com/anticlutch/posts/109960687232283575 e; Some of you are absolute retards who think I just shared and divulged info to glowniggers without a lawyer present, go dilate with @boone and an hero.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (92).
[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Unless you're using (((TOR)))

You trust (((TOR)))? The thing developed by the US government?

I don't understand why you didn't expect that.

Because that type of tracking isn't proof and isn't legally viable. Also while it may be possible it's costly to do such an exhaustive search for some shit poster who didn't break the law and isn't even saying something meaningful for glowies to expend so much money, time and effort into finding that way. People like you and the other guy in this thread going down this route are seriously lacking critical thinking. Yes, it's possible, it's also possible to drive 300 mph on a street legal car so then you should go do it. You and he need to stop ignoring the most important part of doing something: the effort and cost.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Because that type of tracking isn't proof and isn't legally viable.

Doesn't mean they won't confront you with it. And I bet you didn't outright deny it, so that's confirmation. Next step, if they were going to prosecute, would be... Damned if I can remember the term for it. They'll lie about how they linked you to the information. Like, they'll claim they received an anonymous tip about it, or their computer noticed similarities in the way it was written.

As for the reliability of TOR, it's a complicated question. If you use it rarely, and take special measures, it can mask you somewhat; but use it often or if they're already looking at you and it won't protect you.

Edit: I remembered the term. "Plausible deniability".

[–] • 0 pt
[–] • 0 pt

Hum. And you think someone who didn't post it would've responded the same way?

That's the problem, you're not arguing this in court, they're fishing.