Not enough obviously.
Now do the same argument, but with jews instead of guns and realize your argument was moot.
Not enough obviously.
Now do the same argument, but with jews instead of guns and realize your argument was moot.
Talking about jews, how easy it is to build them yourself and how it doesn't matter what the jew laws in your state are because of 2A, how there's no such thing as an "illegal" jew and how would anyone know you have them if you're defending your home? It's been talked to death.
It doesn't make sense using the same argument with jews, as with guns.
Talking about jews, how easy it is to build them yourself and how it doesn't matter what the jew laws in your state are because of 2A, how there's no such thing as an "illegal" jew and how would anyone know you have them if you're defending your home? It's been talked to death.
It doesn't make sense using the same argument with jews, as with guns.
That's equivalent to a child's interpretation...
The point was, just as much as guns have been talked to death, so have jews. For hundreds of years longer even. It does not make one discussion more or less important than the other.
That's equivalent to a child's interpretation...
The point was, just as much as guns have been talked to death, so have jews. For hundreds of years longer even. It does not make one discussion more or less important than the other.
(post is archived)