Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

601

double slit*

I hate scientists so much. They don't practice science, they practice dogma.

double slit* I hate scientists so much. They don't practice science, they practice dogma.

(post is archived)

[–] • 3 pts (edited )

That's not true. There are honest ones that are actually scientists. The problem is that the academic system is fueled by grant money. Professors must get grant money. It supplements their income and allows them to do the research which is the basis for their street cred amongst their peers. That grant money is dolled out by the NSF and other organizations that are completely infiltrated and controlled by the global jewish mafia.

The other issue is that the researchers "specialize" in one field, and build more and more research on top of their prior research. If the foundational research their entire life's work is built on turns out to be bullshit, their professional career is bullshit. This is the reason the old ones become dogmatic.

It's a combination of jewish corruption and human ego destroying science.

[–] • 2 pts

Ur problem is ur focused on the wrong slit experiment if you catch my dorito mr. bandito

[–] • 1 pt

This thread is about your mother.

[–] • 0 pt

ah yes my mother. quite good quite good.

[–] • 2 pts

you mean the double slit, where a single photon shows up as a dot on the screen but if you shoot enough photons, each separate from the others) you end up with interference patterns ... right ?

yes, we really do not know

the model of reality we have now allow us to do some good predictions and it works (limited on a specific set of initial conditions)

so, yes, it is a "model" we have NO idea whatsoever where everything comes from

and .... yes, putting God in the equation does not solve much, unfortunately

(this does NOT mean that HE does not exist, just that we cannot prove either way)

[–] • 0 pt

you mean the

Yes how depending on if you view the photons or not changes the result. The problem with that is two-fold, the first being that we have the complete and total understanding of all information available in the system (experiment), and two being the assumption that viewing doesn't change some physical phenomena in the system.

For example, if I have a glass top stove turned on and I place my hand on it, the stove top will cool. Not much but it will cool. We didn't always know that, in ages past we would have assumed it stayed the same temperature. We had no idea that energy, some, would be transfered.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

"the first being that we have the complete and total understanding of all information available in the system"

We agree on this. Most scientists are so arrogant that they actually believe they have this total understanding..even as they ironically admit that the very reason for their experiments is to gain understanding in the first place.

"two being the assumption that viewing doesn't change some physical phenomena"

Every scientific explanation I've heard about this has assumed the opposite: that the very act of observation does have a physical effect... of course, they can't explain why this is.

I've got my own theory. In truth, we live in a digital simulation anyhow. Not that there is necessarily a computer involved, but it is digital in that there is apparently a finite point at which physical matter can no longer be divided down.. IE, at a small enough scale, something either exists or it doesn't.. which means at the basest of levels, all the physical world is binary, 1 or 0. So then, every particle (or lack thereof) is potential in the opposite direction. The outside force which massages physical particles isn't physical itself. It's extra-dimensional. It would have to be. Man is a spiritual being. The spirit realm is the real realm. We're all trapped in a high-def VR scenario, until we're not. If the physical world were analog, the only limitation in dividing matter down would be the size of the knife blade used to do it.

Well, except for you. You are a cocksucker of highest order, and probably don't have a spirit or soul. I'm pretty sure you were injected as an actual NPC in the simulation.

[–] • 0 pt

..we live in a digital simulation anyhow.

Not a single thing you said after that even suggests that's necessarily the case. What if reality works in a binary sense all the way down? That doesn't mean we're in a simulation. All it means is that all the way down, reality is binary and there is nothing wrong with that. There's also nothing wrong with reality being ternary or quaternary or none of the above.

[–] • 0 pt

Me being picky, the example of the hand on the stove is logically different than observing the photon

regardless of me being picky .... yes, basically we have no idea on what is space and how things work

we do have some rough rules that re very useful, that is it

my personal wonder is gravity and how, so far, there is no anti gravity

I bet, eventually, somebody will discover it as a "peculiar" property of some type of matter placed in a very specific EM field + forces

[–] • 0 pt

In the end, humans - ESPECIALLY scientists (and obviously politicians) are full of unearned hubris (kek). It's disgusting. There may be some good scientists but there are also some good people who have killed a human.

[–] • 1 pt

Way too much nerd faggotry lately on this site.

[–] • 0 pt

Read