Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

307

They're apparently to the point where if they were to break up, he'd die.

It's totally not the vax, tho. But he's a bot, as soon as the narrative changed from "prevents disease" to "just makes it less severe," he was repeating it like it was programmed.

They're apparently to the point where if they were to break up, he'd die. It's totally not the vax, tho. But he's a bot, as soon as the narrative changed from "prevents disease" to "just makes it less severe," he was repeating it like it was programmed.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (53).
[–] • 2 pts

Wrong, and dangerous..

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Nope, only dangerous if one believes they have no need to procreate in order to for them via their DNA to 'live forever'.

Implying that childless people can somehow 'live forever' or go on to another life is not only unverifiable but neglects the actual need to procreate, which we all know is a globohomo agenda.

[–] • 0 pt

>Implying that childless people can somehow 'live forever' or go on to another life is not only unverifiable but neglects the actual need to procreate

That would be their own personal sin, but at any rate it doesn't prove anything about an afterlife.

[–] • 0 pt

Exactly, no proof of an afterlife.

But all people alive today are living proof of every single ancestor they have ever had, and as long as they continue to procreate that DNA will continue to 'live forever'.