Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

427

There is no logical reason for it. Charge whatever price you want for the digital things people are never going to be allowed to own and be done with it.

Digital library programs are a joke. Why make 30 people wait for two "copies" of a digital thing when it can be multiplied more than the money the public library paid to have two "copies"?

Ridiculous.

There is no logical reason for it. Charge whatever price you want for the digital things people are never going to be allowed to own and be done with it. Digital library programs are a joke. Why make 30 people wait for two "copies" of a digital thing when it can be multiplied more than the money the public library paid to have two "copies"? Ridiculous.

(post is archived)

[–] • 5 pts

jews. Yes, artificial scarcity. The music industry is based on this. The means of distribution is essentially zero, yet they try to model the old school vinyl distribution they once enjoyed. Books are exactly the same. However, I prefer old school books because they can't be revised.

[–] • 5 pts

because they can't be revised.

Or revoked.

[–] • 3 pts

I have a book that says nigger.

[–] [deleted] • 3 pts

jews love to make money off of doing jack fuck, as the old saying goes, jews having to work a day's job is the real holocaust. Remove all the management, and proxy jobs and industries and the jews would die since they wouldnt be able to syphon any money. Look at insurance, the only reason insurance is so expensive is because insurance made it expensive, the industry uses its own corrupt practices to justify its own existence

[–] • 1 pt

The same can be found in "precious" gems, "precious" metals and all things that are actually precious. The reasons are the same for each and the culprit is the same for each.

[–] • 1 pt

Because price isn't dictated by cost of production. Price is dictated by supply vs. demand. Only communist systems dictate to producers how much of their product they must produce, and those systems always fail.

[–] • 2 pts

Because price isn't dictated by cost of production. Price is dictated by supply vs. demand.

One could argue that the cost of production has an inverse correlation to supply.

Likewise demand has an inverse correlation to cost.

Only communist systems dictate to producers how much of their product they must produce, and those systems always fail.

How does this concept apply to an already made product that can be copied infinitely at relatively no cost to the individuals that produced it?

[–] • 1 pt

One could argue that the cost of production has an inverse correlation to supply.

Generally, but a producer can choose to make as few or many as he likes. He can make 1 or 1 million. His choice.

How does this concept apply to an already made product that can be copied infinitely at relatively no cost to the individuals that produced it?

Because there's nothing to do about somebody not making as many copies of their product as you wish they'd make.

[–] • 2 pts

Because there's nothing to do about somebody not making as many copies of their product as you wish they'd make.

There isn't any making to it.