Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

561

Biden said in February that we’d take the pipeline out.

At 1:01:30 there’s a video of him saying precisely that: https://youtu.be/-eBAhpi7mYk

So, when normies and MSM try to say “Putin took out his own pipeline”, educate them about their “president”.

Biden said in February that we’d take the pipeline out. At 1:01:30 there’s a video of him saying precisely that: https://youtu.be/-eBAhpi7mYk So, when normies and MSM try to say “Putin took out his own pipeline”, educate them about their “president”.

(post is archived)

[–] • 6 pts

So technically all involved are global terrorists?

This is huge.

[–] • 1 pt

Well, I mean part of war is destroying your enemy’s supply lines and capability to bring in revenue. This certainly would fit the bill for an appropriate military target, though I think our involvement in all of this is bullshit to begin with. But it is generally a legit target in the context of “war” as it hurts the opposing government’s ability to gain revenue.

However, the part that I have a hard time wrapping my head around is that we (or whoever did this) just basically ensured that Germany is in a very tough position for the upcoming winter. They’ve also taken off the table any chance at Europe negotiating with Russia for their natural gas supply…because now there’s no natural gas supply to negotiate.

On the other hand, I also distinctly remember Trump telling the Germans “hey, you know this is really stupid that you’re getting all your gas from Russia” and they laughed at him. He turned out being 100% fucking right and now THEY are the stupid ones.

[–] • 1 pt

It's already proven to be the US. US amphibious assault ship was spotted 30 KM from the (((sabotage))) site.

[–] • 0 pt

Just because a ship of ours was in the area doesn’t necessarily mean shit. Our navy patrols all sorts of areas anyhow.

Though I do agree it was likely us who did it…but again, I’m basing that on Biden’s own words.

[–] • 0 pt

Right. Not Russia ships, not Chinese ships, not sandjew caravans but a US amphibious assault ship. A part of a carrier group that doesn't venture off on it's own without a mission. Stop arguing against yourself.

[–] • 0 pt

Why would there be no Russian ships guarding their own pipeline?

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt
[–] • 1 pt (edited )

"If they say they are going to do something, and then it happens, they probably did it." - David Martin

[–] • 0 pt

The worst part about this is, his handlers probably did do it. He's medicated and left out of the loop suffering from late stage dementia.

[–] • 0 pt

Since the US is part of NATO, the NATO powers will never tell you who did it.

[–] • 1 pt

Well the point of my post is that NATO doesn’t need to tell us who did it. Biden already told us: him.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Another line in the sand drawn by another Dim, nothing new here.

EDIT: Just tripped across , the Pols say we did do it!

[–] • 0 pt

It was definitely an Unidentified State Actor.

[–] • 0 pt

I'm not sure about future stuff but there's a lot of refurbishing work done up north east with natural gas. We may not be drilling but we are doing something

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Nordstream is almost obviously a false flag.

The pipe lost pressure. Ok who’s telling us this? “Them”. Ok it got attacked. Who’s telling us this? “Them” again.

Take a look at this -

(Gab is fucking down great) There is a link by Tommy Robinson showing Germans protesting to open the nordstream the day before it was “attacked”.

https://gab.com/TommyRobinsonOfficial/posts/109073446073254339

It probably wasn’t attacked at all. Just turned off and false flagged.

[–] • 0 pt

Biden said they would take it out. Then it is taken out.. and you’re saying it wasn’t?

I’m confused by your logic. There’s no need for a false flag here.

Load more (1 reply)