WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

It came to me today as I was noodling around the Internet. The gold standard for criminal justice is execution. What do I mean by that?

Our money used to be backed by gold. It was impossible for the value to become wildly inflated because the amount of gold backing the money was stable. The dollar kept its value, and people trusted its worth. Then we were taken off the gold standard. What happened? The value of the dollar began to shrink. It was no longer founded on anything real, and therefore could change in extreme ways. People lost faith in the value of the dollar. They stopped saving their money, and went into debt. There was no incentive to save.

Apply that to the criminal justice system. The justice system is based, at the most basic level, on the biblical truism "An eye for an eye." This means that the punishment should be proportional to the crime. In Muslim countries this is taken literally. Thieves have their hand cut off. Throughout our history, the punishment for murder has been execution. It's the bedrock of criminal justice, the foundation upon which the rest is built. An eye for an eye, a life for a life. But this has largely been taken away from us. The consequence? Nobody believes in the criminal justice system. Nobody really believes justice is being administered, because judges can choose to give whatever sentence strikes their fancy, depending on the sex or race of the criminal. Plea bargaining further eroded public trust in the system.

Eliminating execution from criminal justice has had an effect analogous to eliminating the gold standard from our monetary system. Trust is gone. The system no longer has the foundation "An eye for an eye," and without that, there is no real concept of justice. Justice is different from deterrent, or punishment. Justice comes from God. Justice has a rightness to the feel of it -- we all know it when we feel it. But liberals have taken that from us. There is no justice in the justice system.

It came to me today as I was noodling around the Internet. The gold standard for criminal justice is execution. What do I mean by that? Our money used to be backed by gold. It was impossible for the value to become wildly inflated because the amount of gold backing the money was stable. The dollar kept its value, and people trusted its worth. Then we were taken off the gold standard. What happened? The value of the dollar began to shrink. It was no longer founded on anything real, and therefore could change in extreme ways. People lost faith in the value of the dollar. They stopped saving their money, and went into debt. There was no incentive to save. Apply that to the criminal justice system. The justice system is based, at the most basic level, on the biblical truism "An eye for an eye." This means that the punishment should be proportional to the crime. In Muslim countries this is taken literally. Thieves have their hand cut off. Throughout our history, the punishment for murder has been execution. It's the bedrock of criminal justice, the foundation upon which the rest is built. An eye for an eye, a life for a life. But this has largely been taken away from us. The consequence? Nobody believes in the criminal justice system. Nobody really believes justice is being administered, because judges can choose to give whatever sentence strikes their fancy, depending on the sex or race of the criminal. Plea bargaining further eroded public trust in the system. Eliminating execution from criminal justice has had an effect analogous to eliminating the gold standard from our monetary system. Trust is gone. The system no longer has the foundation "An eye for an eye," and without that, there is no real concept of justice. Justice is different from deterrent, or punishment. Justice comes from God. Justice has a rightness to the feel of it -- we all know it when we feel it. But liberals have taken that from us. There is no justice in the justice system.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

Agreed. Corporal punishment too. All these guys spend a few months or a year or 2 in the local jail, come out with tats and new criminal friends to do some dumb shit again. Get a dui or any "minor charge" bring them to main Street on Sunday after church, put em in a diaper and bonnet then whip em till they cry and beg for mercy. In front of everyone, broadcast live on local stations. Nobody likes to be humiliated in front of their peers.

[–] 1 pt

humiliate people over a victimless crime? You are sadistic

[–] 1 pt

Just getting old n grouchy.

Fair enough. I thought the gold standard was evidence but ok. Evidence is nice because you can hold it in your hand and analyze it for purity just like a gold bar, but executions are a good cheap way to placate the mob. Both have merit. I don't pick sides. /s

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Yeah but sometimes people get killed for crimes they don't commit and we can't have a system that is right 98 times out of 100 because the 2 times it's wrong it makes society guilty of murder!

Also

We can't stop illegals at the border just because 33% of the time they're criminals. That would mean making the lives of 66% of them worse. A net loss to the poor unwashed masses. So what if they occasionally kill a citizen. That's just cherry picking. Look at this successful illegal immigrant who is a beacon of the community!