before
That's where you done goofed in my estimation. EUA medical trials happened. Full approval was sought for Comirnaty. Comirnaty isn't available in a medical setting yet. But just because it isn't available yet doesn't stop it from infringing on intellectual property.
None of these makers in the suit have a Comirnaty though. And none of the claims refer to a Comirnaty that is released, because it's not and never has been. It has always been a spectre on paper.
So then the IP posturing is to convince or make people assume that Spikevax and Comirnaty exist.
E; fuck, that is why they are burning down the safety and efficacy of the EUA formulations
I don't know and I haven't been paying attention to the mrna bio-shot for a few months because we all knew what it wasn't since it was first talked about.
(post is archived)