I'm just confused how before the whole jew mrna bio-shot there was this actual vaccine called the "Comirnaty". And none of the available mrna vax or any vax on Earth was "Comirnaty". The FDA docs referred to it etc. Now the claim is that these are "Comirnaty"? I don't get it. Do I have this wrong?
before
That's where you done goofed in my estimation. EUA medical trials happened. Full approval was sought for Comirnaty. Comirnaty isn't available in a medical setting yet. But just because it isn't available yet doesn't stop it from infringing on intellectual property.
None of these makers in the suit have a Comirnaty though. And none of the claims refer to a Comirnaty that is released, because it's not and never has been. It has always been a spectre on paper.
So then the IP posturing is to convince or make people assume that Spikevax and Comirnaty exist.
E; fuck, that is why they are burning down the safety and efficacy of the EUA formulations
(post is archived)