Reasonable predictions of what is to come over the next 2-4 years.

301

• (edited )

Very few names (and certainly fewer of significance) will face consequences for the last six years.

Trump will be outed as having been behind some things we thought the left was behind.

The u.s. will step away from israel as an ally.

We will normalize relations with russia

We will disavow any cooperation with Turkey.

There will be large scale political upheaval, social unrest, and military turmoil in saudi arabia and yemen.

We may see significant muslim uprisings in eastern europe.

The bitcoin network will splinter again and face a resurgence in value across all coins as the rouble and petroyuan formalize some ties and the american regime grumbles but accepts some things are outside its control.

Next years harvest will be even worse than this year, with the weather even less predictable in north america and europe--this will be part of the catalyst for normalization of relations with russia.

Terrorism will become a significant new problem in the u.s, even worse than the 90s, as the FBI comes under fire over the next 2 years.

Twitter will face public structural financial problems, as will other tech companies, as the tech bubble doesn't formally pop, but is openly questioned by mainstream financial investors combine with pressure from astroturf retail investor movements.

The american military, or civilian leadership, will openly acknowledge we are no longer ahead in hypersonics, air-superiority, and other areas of combat.

Amnesty will likely not be officially passed, but there will grow, on both sides of the aisle, even as the RNC talks tough, more and more bills and policies and executive decisions that effectively create total amnesty--even more total than what we see today. A complete abandonment of immigration rules. These will be somewhat 'tightened' under red rule, but will be a continual sore spot, that the party 'fails' to do anything about every. single. time.

A new party will rise directly because of this last fact. It will face severe suppression by the secret police, both formally, through raids, and courts, and informally through other suppressive actions by various branches of the administrative state.

Trump will kneecap the teachers unions specifically, with the schedule F mandate, but while greatly crowing about the success of it, it will for the most part lead to only a fraction of the actual firings we anticipated.

There will be some sort of debt or loan forgiveness or debt restructuring for the education system, and likely other types of debt. Wallstreet will simultenously gorge itself on bailouts, and deeply protest 'debt forgiveness'.

That is all.

The RNC will gain or lose no more than 5-10 seats in congress. Trump or someone endorsed by him will get into office in 2024. Or a 'moderate' left winger. But biden will definitely not have a second term. The u.s. will give preference to AMD over intel. There will be a big shakeup in the media. We will (briefly) go to war with china over taiwan. A supreme court justice, maybe two, will die at the hands of the regime. 2024-2028 will see a much wider swing in congressional and senatorial seats. With both congress and the senate slightly red. The size of the IRS will be normalized. Very few names (and certainly fewer of significance) will face consequences for the last six years. Trump will be outed as having been behind some things we thought the left was behind. The u.s. will step away from israel as an ally. We will normalize relations with russia We will disavow any cooperation with Turkey. There will be large scale political upheaval, social unrest, and military turmoil in saudi arabia and yemen. We may see significant muslim uprisings in eastern europe. The bitcoin network will splinter again and face a resurgence in value across all coins as the rouble and petroyuan formalize some ties and the american regime grumbles but accepts some things are outside its control. Next years harvest will be even worse than this year, with the weather even less predictable in north america and europe--this will be part of the catalyst for normalization of relations with russia. Terrorism will become a significant new problem in the u.s, even worse than the 90s, as the FBI comes under fire over the next 2 years. Twitter will face public structural financial problems, as will other tech companies, as the tech bubble *doesn't* formally pop, but is openly questioned by mainstream financial investors combine with pressure from astroturf retail investor movements. The american military, or civilian leadership, will openly acknowledge we are no longer ahead in hypersonics, air-superiority, and other areas of combat. Amnesty will likely not be officially passed, but there will grow, on both sides of the aisle, even as the RNC talks tough, more and more bills and policies and executive decisions that effectively create total amnesty--**even** more total than what we see today. A complete abandonment of immigration rules. These will be somewhat 'tightened' under red rule, but will be a continual sore spot, that the party 'fails' to do anything about every. single. time. A new party will rise directly because of this last fact. It will face severe suppression by the secret police, both formally, through raids, and courts, and informally through other suppressive actions by various branches of the administrative state. Trump will kneecap the teachers unions specifically, with the schedule F mandate, but while greatly crowing about the success of it, it will for the most part lead to only a fraction of the actual firings we anticipated. There will be some sort of debt or loan forgiveness or debt restructuring for the education system, and likely other types of debt. Wallstreet will simultenously gorge itself on bailouts, and deeply protest 'debt forgiveness'. That is all.

[–] • 0 pt

I don’t want to be a downer, but 60% of the vaccinated people in the US quickly dying off from a killer, vaccine evading strain of SARS-CoV-2 sometime in the next year is a reasonable prediction at this point.

That is Geert Vanden Bosche’s worst case scenario and so far every part of it that he predicted has come true. In fact, we may be in the late stages where the sudden outbreak and die off can start any week now.

link

[–] • 0 pt

(edited )

I don’t want to be a downer, but 60% of the vaccinated people in the US quickly dying off from a killer, vaccine evading strain of SARS-CoV-2 sometime in the next year is a reasonable prediction at this point. That is Geert Vanden Bosche’s worst case scenario and so far every part of it that he predicted has come true. In fact, we may be in the late stages where the sudden outbreak and die off can start any week now.

Eh sounds the doommongers equivalent of hopium. "In two more weeks/months/years" (massive die-of cuz of the coof vax) is the new "trust the plan." I'm not saying you're wrong. I'm not even saying its unlikely. I'm saying accepting it is an easy way to stop thinking about the big picture. It's complacency disguised as hope.

And part of the the big picture is that theres been a continual failure of these worst-cases to come true. Hell, go look even at my worst predictions.

Complacency.

We can't expect things to change, in big ways, or quick ways, for better or worse, simply because we hope for or expect something different. That a very easy way to shut off our brains so we don't have to confront reality head-on.

A better starting position is to ask why you think the mass-die-off scenario is true. And if so, what that means about others intents and motives.

Edit:

Go down the line. List say, twenty people you can think of, from international leaders, to members of rival political parties, lobbyists (adl), to spies (head of the cia), to billionaires (gates), to 'big think' NGOS like wef and schwab. This is just first-order considerations. Now ask what does it mean to them and their agendas, interests, personal wealth, the systems that they work for (yale, vs harvard for example, which, rather than schools, are actually elite political institutions), the parties that serve under them. How does the scenario play out for them in their home country, in their new zealand bunker, in their town or homecity? How does it play out during a national revolt? Or a collapse? How does it play out if the parties switch hands?

Do that for all of them, and then start looking at the commonalities of what they might want, and what they don't want.

> I don’t want to be a downer, but 60% of the vaccinated people in the US quickly dying off from a killer, vaccine evading strain of SARS-CoV-2 sometime in the next year is a reasonable prediction at this point. That is Geert Vanden Bosche’s worst case scenario and so far every part of it that he predicted has come true. In fact, we may be in the late stages where the sudden outbreak and die off can start any week now. Eh sounds the doommongers equivalent of hopium. "In two more weeks/months/years" (massive die-of cuz of the coof vax) is the new "trust the plan." I'm not saying you're wrong. I'm not even saying its unlikely. I'm saying accepting it is an easy way to stop thinking about the big picture. It's complacency disguised as hope. And part of the the big picture is that theres been a continual failure of these worst-cases to come true. Hell, go look even at *my* worst predictions. Complacency. We can't expect things to change, in *big* ways, or *quick* ways, for better or worse, simply because we hope for or expect something different. That a very easy way to shut off our brains so we don't have to confront reality head-on. A better starting position is to ask why you think the mass-die-off scenario is true. And if so, what that means about others intents and motives. Edit: Go down the line. List say, twenty people you can think of, from international leaders, to members of rival political parties, lobbyists (adl), to spies (head of the cia), to billionaires (gates), to 'big think' NGOS like wef and schwab. This is just first-order considerations. Now ask what does it mean to *them* and their agendas, interests, personal wealth, the systems that they work for (yale, vs harvard for example, which, rather than schools, are actually elite political institutions), the parties that serve under them. How does the scenario play out for them in their home country, in their new zealand bunker, in their town or homecity? How does it play out during a national revolt? Or a collapse? How does it play out if the parties switch hands? Do that for all of them, and then start looking at the commonalities of what they might want, and what they don't want.

parent
link

(post is archived)