It's not so much that it's strange but more that it's improbable.
It's not so much that it's strange but more that it's improbable.
It is improbable on the surface. But I look toward our need to (formally) keep Turkey on our side, without which NATO splinters, and objectives bigger than the middle east end up lost.
I look at the leftward swing, and the essentially anti-zionist nature of the left. How the RNC works for the DNC. Even with every cabinet full of zionists, never forget the maintenance of the eurodollar and the eurozone is the ultimate goal of british neo-imperialism (modern zionism).
On that alter, they'd sacrifice israel to keep nato. Personally I think it would be retarded for them to do that, instead of acknowledge that the heartland thesis is dead and accept their limitations , but I don't make those decisions.
If I'm correct, then israel and the u.s. should be bombing iran or turkish proxies sooner rather than later (14-15 months at most). Because by then, turkey will be in the full-swing of pivoting to russia and asia instead of continuing its current charade as a go-between 'situational ally' of the west.
It's why the israelis bought trump, to negotiate with larger partners. And what he did was do just that, building walls to prevent a landrush against them, and establishing alliances with saudi arabia. It's a poison pill, so when the domestic regime in the u.s. pulls out of the eurodollar project (dollar decoupling as we export our inflation to our allies and trade partners), we still can't decouple without also decoupling from middle eastern oil.
Only they didn't expect saudi arabia to turn to russia as a potential economic partner (well we in america didn't). Effectively the sauds became israelis lifeboat to the next grift, now that the EU's economy is burning.
If you think about it, you know I'm correct on this one.
edit: thanks for the comment btw. Wouldn't have fully considered this analysis without you challenging the premise.
I like how you work.
I like how you work.
If the israelis (as opposed to the zionists) are smart, they may use whatever influence they have left in the u.s. (before we go full bolshevik), and pivot to somewhere where they had past influence or control. Not banking on russia. Not banking on china. Not banking on america.
If they were smart, they'd go take south africa back, drive out the bantus, and use it as a foothold into the wealthiest continent on the planet. If I were a 'right wing white extremist terrorist' like the u.s. government claims half of us are, and had a quarter billion in wealth to work with, thats what I would go do (take-over south africa from british proxies). Anyone would manage it better at this stage, than who is in charge now. It would be a mercy. Alas, such things are not to be.
I suspect though the israelis will realize too late that they're disposable, and cling bitterly to the dream of world zionism, like an anchor around the neck of a drowning man.
I like how you work.
Well thank you. The more true or probable/quality information I have to work with, the better or potentially more accurate the opinions.
I think that benefits everyones, on all sides.
(post is archived)