There was not a shot fired, not a single person was killed or injured. It was a raid. It was terrible, disgusting, and incredibly stupid, you don't need to try to make it worse than it actually is. It is bad enough all on its own.
Irrelevant if shots were fired. An attack is an attack. It was force of violence for political ends. Technically it's called terrorism. To lie and claim this isn't an attack or that shots are required for an attack is simply dishonest. Period.
It fits the definition of an attack.
It fits the definition of terrorism.
attack verb 1. take aggressive military action against (a place or enemy forces) with weapons or armed force
By that logic you could claim that every time a police officer pulled you over for speeding it is an attack. I think that you are arguing semantics. Overblowing things and making it seem terrible is a common tactic of the left, for example the January 6th insurrection. Everyone knows that it wasn't an insurrection. It was 99% peaceful and law abiding with a couple of shit heads doing things they shouldn't have been doing most likely lead on by federal agents. It was not an interaction and everybody knows it, the same as this was not an attack. Don't get me wrong, I agree with your sentiment but I do not think that over blowing it and making it into something 10 times worse does not help our cause in any way.
False. Just because facts prove you wrong doesn't make reductio ad absurdum valid. It simply confirms you're purposely attempting to distort and hide the facts.
policing: the regulation and control of a community, especially for the maintenance of public order, safety, health, morals, etc. There is nothing about this attack which is "policing." Stop lying.
How many nukes does Israel have? You are literally doing what you are attempting to project onto me. You stink and are glowing.
(post is archived)