Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

344

And they accidentally logged in on the same account on two of their devices.

https://pic8.co/sh/k4rhcv.png Taken from

https://pic8.co/sh/zTmVfp.png Taken from

noticed first.

And they accidentally logged in on the same account on two of their devices. https://pic8.co/sh/k4rhcv.png Taken from [here](https://poal.co/s/GuessTheRace/558112/53cfc812-d36b-4541-844d-4e946a726754) https://pic8.co/sh/zTmVfp.png Taken from [here](https://poal.co/s/Mildlyinteresting/558256/623b11b2-67ac-4b0b-b19a-e52fbe81ecd0#cmnts) @Normal noticed first.

(post is archived)

[–] • 2 pts

Always funny to see, and a reminder of the unavoidable douchebaggery of dealing with the unter. If I had more time, would go through the posts, should be easy to identify the other alts.

[–] • 0 pt

What is an "unter"? Careful reading my posts, you might find something even more offensive that a double comment.

[–] • 1 pt

We are all faggots here, where you been?

[–] • 0 pt

I did not use a different account. I only added a comment to my original comment. What is wrong with that? If you did not find it funny, I don't really care.

[–] • 1 pt

There's an edit button you can use to add context to a comment.

You replied to the first one some 14 hours later. In the first comment you were referring to a male (himself) and in the second one you were referring to a female (herself). It would appear to an outsider that you are attempting to feign ignorance to the gender of the person involved.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

If an outsider went through 10 pages of comment history they would see the edit button has been used twice in the last 16 days. One on a one liner that couldn't have been expanded with context, the other being a paragraph long comment that could have been expanded for context, but is impossible to tell. So it is clear the poster knows of the edit button, and 199/200 times does not use it to expand a comment with context and likely doesn't ever use it to expand with context. Is there some fuckery afoot? Sure why not, but some fuckery afoot backstopped by weeks of user behavior? Eh, kind of reaching there hombre.

E1: And the two posts are referencing two different people, the first one presuming the manager was male and innocent, the second one expanding that it was a woman who was innocent and not an employee of the restaurant.

E2: 20 comments per page? Corrected my stat.

[–] • 1 pt

I use the edit button to correct spelling mistakes. People use the edit button to change the context of what they said after other people make comments. This is a technique to make those people look bad by altering what they were commenting on. I don't do that. I only edit spelling, not the original context of my comment. On the above, I assumed it was blacks attacking the staff because that is the most common occurrence. Then I learned they were whites acting like niggers and I made the second comment.

[–] • 0 pt

I use it to correct spelling mistakes, not to change the context of my comments. Even if my comments are wrong or misinformed because especially today, most people are wrong and misinformed.