The three supporting legs of globalism, or modernism are: 1. banks & corporate brands (wallstreet and silicon valley) 2. the media & activists 3. the university, NGO, and administrative state bureaucracy. Of these three the easiest to tackle is the banks. Neither the left nor the right like the banks. Arguments happen over the media. the 'fake news' bit of attacking the media, unwittingly set us up so that anyone that does is instantly put in the right-camp) Arguments happen over the bureaucracy. Anyone against it is said to being "attacking our democracy!" Brand/corporate support is drying-up do to cost of living. But even better, *no* side supports the banks. They are the weakest link and should be politically, socially, and economically destroyed. Without mercy. On all fronts. The left is unhappy because of bankruptcy laws and media-shilling to 'get an education'. They're all fucked in the current economy. The right is unahappy because they either can't afford the lives their parents had, or can't afford to give their families the same life they had growing up. Every side is unhappy about the rising cost of basic goods. The disfunction and looting has gone on for so long that its now out in the open and has lead to a **groundswell** of serious anger in the public. No one knows who to blame, and people are busy engaging in blue-team-red-team. But I'll you WHAT. **I** know who to blame. And I know WHO people are going to blame once it gets bad enough that teams don't matter. The banks and wallstreet. They'll try and turn the anticorporate push into a frame of a pot-fuelled get-a-job!-hippy-commune and that will fail this time. They'll go for the race angle, and that'll maybe move into identity politics for a brief time. But when they think they're succeeding, congress, the senate, and their banks and wallstreet bankers will go back to corporate-welfare mass looting, and that'll make things worse than before. Enough that the identity politics will fail. Then they'll try rackeeting and party-busting as new 'populist' parties form in the vacuum, just as they did against the right for the last ten years, and against the lefts and moderates before that (e.x the libertarians diverted into the 'green' party). That will fail because economic issues will become so dominate with the failure of the middle class, that localist-influences (bottom up politics) will force the issue. That tends to happen when you have wealthier, more intelligent, more forward-thinking elements like the middle and upper class (former anyway) asses-to-elbows with the poor at their front doorstep. You get either solidarity and mass movements, or reactionary populism. And I'm saying we can acclerate this trend by going after the banks. Making their job difficult. They've looted for so long, all they have left to keep the balancing act going, is corruption. You hem them in with a few laws, an anti-bank movement, and it'll blow up the entire economy. The goal is to increase economic and political dysfunction. To drive a wedge between the bases and their parties. Ironically the solution to the top-down class warfare the occupation regime is waging against americans (and western nations), is **bottom up** class warfare.