The great danger of nuclear plants is this:
If unmaintained they risk melting down. Meltdowns could spread fallout that lasts thirty years or more, instead of the thirty days typical of nuclear weapons fallout.
Any state planning a nuclear war or other major war, that didn't want to risk all these plants melting down, would do what?
Wind them down. Reduce energy use. Reduce on-site fuel. Shut them down, or even possibly begin to dismantle them.
I guess thats why they kept fear mongering about 'get your vax!'
Because if enough of the world population refused to go along with voluntary sterilization, plan (b) was simple--
Wipe out all the cities with air bursts.
The great danger of nuclear plants is this:
If unmaintained they risk melting down. Meltdowns could spread fallout that lasts *thirty years* or more, instead of the thirty days typical of nuclear weapons fallout.
Any state planning a nuclear war or other major war, that didn't want to risk all these plants melting down, would do what?
Wind them down. Reduce energy use. Reduce on-site fuel. Shut them down, or even possibly begin to dismantle them.
I guess thats why they kept fear mongering about 'get your vax!'
Because if enough of the world population refused to go along with voluntary sterilization, plan (b) was simple--
Wipe out all the cities with air bursts.
(post is archived)