We can all laugh at the rich prick who lost it all on beanie babies, but the poor en masse losing it all brings pitchforks.
This is a natural cycle, and acceptable. It also is a form of eugenics, which eliminates the stupid.
I see no reason fools should not be allowed to be parted from their money.
Limiting such only creates a new aristocracy. Whereas not limiting means the aristocrats have to compete with ever larger numbers of competitors.
> We can all laugh at the rich prick who lost it all on beanie babies, but the poor en masse losing it all brings pitchforks.
This is a natural cycle, and acceptable. It also is a form of eugenics, which eliminates the stupid.
I see no reason fools should not be allowed to be parted from their money.
Limiting such only creates a new aristocracy. Whereas not limiting means the aristocrats have to compete with ever larger numbers of competitors.
(post is archived)