If you'd care to elaborate, I will listen, but what you said makes no sense as I sit and digest it. As I work through the implications of what you say, it sounds fairly permissible to pedorasty, faggotry, abortion, and other societal ills. I don't think most people are able to live life without a sense of order- one could say that a large degree of our current situation is the result of not adhering to a cohesive societal order. What do you perceive to be the difference between "anarchy" and "chaos?"
The best way to explain this, is first with my dearest friend etymology. I break the word down in an-archon. Meaning one ruler. It does not mean "without rules" and is not to be confused with mono-archon. One is mastery of the self, living in harmony with Gods laws. The other is mastery over you, by someone else. Jesus was an anarchist. Paid no taxes, had no slaves, only himself and God were his masters. Physically attacked those who trespassed into his homes and temples. Chaos is lawlessness. Anarchy is living in a state where there need be no authority because you have he self respect to govern yourself appropriately. You can get a more in depth idea of this by watching mark passio "fake ass anarchists" seminar on YouTube
Thanks. I kinda get what you are saying and probably agree with some aspects of that in theory, but I see a lot of issues in getting a society to that point where it could be sustainable. I will try to watch that video. I may report back.
For as long as living men and women adhere to the idea of, and submit to being comfortable slaves, we will never see this as an aggregate. Though the individual can thrive in such a state.
(post is archived)