You're preaching to the choir. Most of us understand it's the jews guilting us into submission. Even some of the niggers understand this. The ones that don't understand, exploit it.
That topic has only come up once in real life (for me) and I used that exact logic. If I am responsible for all of the historical evils committed by men who bear a passing resemblance to me; despite no actual ancestry, then I want the credit for all of the good.
Then I started rattling off items until they admitted I was right.
Online you can rarely get that same gratification.
Except, you are not responsible either for the sins of your ancestors, or their greatness. You are responsible for what falls within your own personal sphere of control -- what lies "within your power," as the Stoics liked to say.
Personally, I don't believe it is wise to concede any point to the left that is invalid or untrue. A just man does not use unjust arguments. White men should not adopt the habits of either niggers or Jews.
Except, you are not responsible either for the sins of your ancestors, or their greatness. You are responsible for what falls within your own personal sphere of control -- what lies "within your power," as the Stoics liked to say.
I know that full well. I alone am responsible for what I do. I am not responsible for what anyone else does.
Personally, I don't believe it is wise to concede any point to the left that is invalid or untrue. A just man does not use unjust arguments. White men should not adopt the habits of either niggers or Jews.
I agree with you. I don't see it as conceding the point, but disproving it. The idea is to use the example they give against them. If X is true, so must Y be true. Simple logic.
It is not conceding anything. It is proving that their argument is just plain dumb.
Just a pick-me-up reminder, brother.
(post is archived)