The constitution is there to let you know that those are the rights the government is supposed to uphold in the event we cannot on our own.
No. No. No. No. The constitution is a limit on the federal government.
How's that been working out?
So in the last 50 years of its 250 year history some activist judges have decided to rule in ways that are against the constitution. How does this invalidate the intent of the Constitution?
Go spam somewhere else faggot. That's literally what this thread calls out. Then you gloat about it? Wonder who would do that?
(post is archived)