What's with the obsession of anti-natural lol ?
Because it's all natural, and there's no difference. What you're saying is akin to saying that hemlock isn't as bad for you if you drink it in its natural state as opposed to a refined form. The reality is it makes no difference. Both ways make you dead.
>What you're saying is akin to saying that hemlock isn't as bad for you if you drink it in its natural state as opposed to a refined form.
I don't believe it's as simple as that, no. Because of what I stated before. Again, you are too dogmatic and allow for no unknown variables. I can't do that.
But I do get the mindset and the black and white thinking. You might be right, but I can't say that at this time.
It was a good discussion.
I don't believe it's as simple as that
Sugar is either bad for you or it's not. It's a question with a binary answer. It can't be good for you and bad for you, depending on whether you eat it with other food.
>Sugar is either bad for you or it's not.
You're a victim of your black and white thinking. Sugar is indeed good for you goofus. But too much isn't.
>It can't be good for you and bad for you, depending on whether you eat it with other food.
No, I leave it open that eating it a more natural state, the bad effects can be mitigated, as I said.
I'm done (really for real) but it was a good discussion (unless you want to take it outside dude).
(post is archived)