The way to fight back is to show that crime was lower when everybody had guns. When the liberal comes out and says the blood is on the hands of the people who don't ban the guns, you have to be the one instead to come out right away and say the blood is on your hands because you took away these people's right to defend themselves so their blood and the death of all these children are because you took away their right to defend themselves and you left them defenseless. You have to hit him hard with that. In fact you should jump right out and flood social media with that the minute one of these shooting starts before they even have a chance to blame the people who don't ban the guns. Each one of you should be flooding social media with this message. And if you're not you're just lazy and you're not helping. It takes masses of people to get this stuff out unless you want to buy tons of bots like George Soros apparently is doing. It's also actually true. If you look you'll find some photographs and things from not even that far back like the 1970s where people were defending schools and stuff literally the students went out to their cars and trucks and got their guns when somebody called in a death threat to the school. Photos like that tell the story and make people realize that, guess what, children actually used to have guns and they used them sensibly to defend themselves and it prevented slaughter rather than causing it. That's how you win this argument.