Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.3K

There is no such thing as just homosexual. What people call homosexual is degenerated brain. Degenerates have many other mental dysfunctions, including homosexuality, pedophilia, zoophilia, necrophilia, sado-masochism, etc...

Degenerates have gender dysphoria and lack of disgust. Because of this they can have sexual intercourse with any being, or even inanimate objects.

There is no such thing as just homosexual. What people call homosexual is degenerated brain. Degenerates have many other mental dysfunctions, including homosexuality, pedophilia, zoophilia, necrophilia, sado-masochism, etc... Degenerates have gender dysphoria and lack of disgust. Because of this they can have sexual intercourse with any being, or even inanimate objects.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (16).
[–] • 1 pt

That is a fair assessment and a reasonable way to protect freedom of speech and freedom from the state in general.

I have been forced to include all gay people as merely instances on the spectrum of deviancy. Meaning, there is something wrong with their neural networks (clearly), and while we can claim that some gay people are "normal" and don't want to hurt children or even parade around, I can no longer accept that as fact because there is no way to prove that to be true. Are all gay people pedophiles? Probably not. Are all gay people on the spectrum and capable of such behaviour? I am no longer sure and leaning heavily towards yes merely by the very nature of the deviancy.

Just for the record, I am not trying to flip your argument. You made an excellent point that answer the problem that I have been running into with my position as it is starting to evolve. I have had to come to the inescapable conclusion that I don't actually believe in freedom and free speech for pedos and degenerates because of the net corrosive nature of these individuals. The problem with my position is that the moment that I subscribe to taking away my enemies freedom, eventually my enemy will gain political access to that same freedom and I have destroyed that which protects me.

Your point is really great. Thanks.