I want to call you a pilpulling kike
if you have run out of arguments then that's what you should do
and the end result today is inferior to that of years past
explain what is inferior by skipping part of the bodies antibody mechanism.
or actual vaccines need to be called something else
why? Isn't 'mRNA vaccine' descriptive enough?
How does a different name change anything? Did people trying to go from A to B shun the new electric trains and wail about not getting a steam one?
to argue over definitions is not pedantry
I'm not convinced that you know what a mRNA vaccine does, other than it inserts magnetic 5G graphene nanobots inside your brain.
Breaking down posts is legit faggotry.they are inferior because the former definition of vaccine was to “provide immunity” the absoluteness of this statement is the issue with changing it to make the covid jab a “vaccine”. It is not descriptive enough because it’s not factual by any definition that hasn’t been changed to meet todays politicized science. A different name changes things because a vaccine for smallpox and a vaccine for covid do not provide the same end result respectively. Therefore they SHOULD not be given the same name. If a vaccine provides protection then whatever provides immunity should be called something else.
Breaking down posts is legit faggotry
yes, but there is so much to correct, so. All you do is ignore what I say anyway
the former definition of vaccine was to “provide immunity”
No, because there are a number of vaccines that do not provide immunity, they require boosters. Typhoid fever vaccines require booster vaccinations every 3 years if you are in a risk area
[and again] the former definition of vaccine was to “provide immunity”
"Dictionary Definitions from Oxford Languages vaccine a substance used to stimulate the production of antibodies and provide immunity against one or several diseases, prepared from the causative agent of a disease, its products, or a synthetic substitute, treated to act as an antigen without inducing the disease"
And yes that has been updated to include the current technologies, because it still fits the "production of antibodies" concept
A different name changes things because a vaccine for smallpox and a vaccine for covid do not provide the same end result respectively
The main types of COVID-19 vaccines:
Messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine Protein subunit vaccine Vector vaccine whole virus vaccine
pick one, they all do the same thing, generate Covid antibodies....
the Chinese whole virus vaccine is the nearest thing you can get to cow pus technology, except it's crap and China is rushing to develop mRNA versions.
If a vaccine provides protection then whatever provides immunity should be called something else
nope, because most people understand what a vaccine does (produces antibodies), the "immunity" means the antibodies are doing something there is no magic process where one thing provides immunity and the other thing provides time limited protection, because it's THE SAME PROCESS...
But even requiring boosters, typhoid vaccines provide immunity, whether or not that is contingent on the boosters is a different discussion. You are a kike though so I’ll end it here. Most people understand the definition of vaccine to mean “provide immunity” because for most people that has been the understanding for the majority of their lives.
(post is archived)