But that’s he thing, the narratives and definitions change so quickly based on the whims of politics based science (or whatever the flavor of the week is) that nobody normal can ever really keep up. If I look up the definition of vaccine today compared to 4 years ago. They’re completely different, and it’s not good enough to just exclaim science changes and definitions have to be updated when you actually compare the facts. The jab today would not be called a vaccine 20 years ago, it would be called a prophylactic at best. But if we’re calling this jab a vaccine based on todays definition of “providing protection” then why do we not have a new definition for actual vaccines that provide immunity. One of these things cannot be called a vaccine and yet they use the umbrella term to, I almost want to say “protect” the jab.I don’t know if this makes any sense, it’s tough for me to articulate my thoughts.
If I look up the definition of vaccine today compared to 4 years ago. They’re completely different
No they aren't, it's whatever is producing antibodies.
"RNA vaccines work by introducing into the body a messenger RNA (mRNA) sequence that contains the genetic instructions for the vaccinated person’s own cells to produce the vaccine antigens and generate an immune response"
It's the same process, it's just skipping the step where the body detects the virus and reacts, and instead goes right to the "this is what you need to make to counter a virus you haven't seen yet" This wasn't possible before because we didn't know how to manipulate this messaging process
if the government bothered to explain this in detail instead of treating us like we were all stupid children, then we wouldn't be in this farcical situation with people turning to bullshit grifters on bitchute for "answers"
What are you pulling that definition from?
That is not the current definition of vaccine. Also, this is the first time I’ve seen a purposeful modifier such as “RNA” vaccine.
But again , this is my point, it’s either a vaccine or it’s not. Modifiers such as RNA vaccine only serve to confuse normal people. The method of delivery is not important to normal people as long as it does in the end what it’s purported to do.
Does an RNA vaccine do the same thing as the up till now standard vaccine? No it does not, therefore one is not a vaccine. I don’t care which one, but it’s dishonest at best.
Does an RNA vaccine do the same thing as the up till now standard vaccine? No it does not, therefore one is not a vaccine
Does a steam train do the same thing as an electric train?
No.
yet both are trains carrying people from A to B, they just use different ways to turn energy into rotational motion
It's relevant that people at the time thought that trains would kill you by suffocation
(post is archived)