Breaking down posts is legit faggotry
yes, but there is so much to correct, so. All you do is ignore what I say anyway
the former definition of vaccine was to “provide immunity”
No, because there are a number of vaccines that do not provide immunity, they require boosters. Typhoid fever vaccines require booster vaccinations every 3 years if you are in a risk area
[and again] the former definition of vaccine was to “provide immunity”
"Dictionary Definitions from Oxford Languages vaccine a substance used to stimulate the production of antibodies and provide immunity against one or several diseases, prepared from the causative agent of a disease, its products, or a synthetic substitute, treated to act as an antigen without inducing the disease"
And yes that has been updated to include the current technologies, because it still fits the "production of antibodies" concept
A different name changes things because a vaccine for smallpox and a vaccine for covid do not provide the same end result respectively
The main types of COVID-19 vaccines:
Messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine Protein subunit vaccine Vector vaccine whole virus vaccine
pick one, they all do the same thing, generate Covid antibodies....
the Chinese whole virus vaccine is the nearest thing you can get to cow pus technology, except it's crap and China is rushing to develop mRNA versions.
If a vaccine provides protection then whatever provides immunity should be called something else
nope, because most people understand what a vaccine does (produces antibodies), the "immunity" means the antibodies are doing something there is no magic process where one thing provides immunity and the other thing provides time limited protection, because it's THE SAME PROCESS...
But even requiring boosters, typhoid vaccines provide immunity, whether or not that is contingent on the boosters is a different discussion. You are a kike though so I’ll end it here. Most people understand the definition of vaccine to mean “provide immunity” because for most people that has been the understanding for the majority of their lives.
But even requiring boosters, typhoid vaccines provide immunity
yet again, NO
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/vis/vis-statements/typhoid.html
"typhoid vaccine is not 100% effective and is not a substitute for being careful about what you eat or drink"
antibodies are antibodies, not magic...
You are a kike though so I’ll end it here.
good, hopefully you've learned something other than bullshit off bitchute
Most people understand the definition of vaccine to mean “provide immunity” because for most people that has been the understanding for the majority of their lives.
It's good that most people now know about the same as a medical student in the first week, because I don't expect most people to know shit about anything unless it directly affects them. ie. Most people are wrong until someone correct them. A pity that Poal hasn't worked out how statistics are read though... "OMG, more vaccinated people die of covid than non vaccinated ones..." FML...
Do more vaccinated people die of smallpox than non-vaccinated? Do more vaccinated people get rabies than non vaccinated?
This is the only time in history when vaccinated people get the thing they’ve been vaccinated against as much as the non-vaccinated. Because it’s not a vaccine. We’ll go in circles on this one but you’ve given me other things to look up so thank you
(post is archived)