Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

This makes a makes a majority of my coworkers who have had their shots. We've had a few non-shot people as well, but they've all reported they had contact with a sick, jabbed person over the holidays.

Thank god for these shots, right?

This makes a makes a majority of my coworkers who have had their shots. We've had a few non-shot people as well, but they've all reported they had contact with a sick, jabbed person over the holidays. Thank god for these shots, right?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (24).
[–] • 2 pts

Yes its because the jabs don't create full memory immunity, only temporary antibody immunity. Hence they aren't a vaccine.

They're only good for a couple of months at best then stop working without constant boosters.

That many jabs needed plus the risk of death from clots.

People that don't understand why it isn't working are simply idiots that can't even understand middle school biology.

[–] • 2 pts

That doesn't explain the positive correlation between vaccination status and the rate of infection. In California at least, the higher the percentage of a county's population that is vaccinated the higher their case rate since January 1.

[–] • 0 pt

Actually it could simply be that after being jabbed, they think they are invincible so go back to normal life putting themselves at higher risk.

Also however many new strains.

[–] • 0 pt

That would suggest the unjabbed are being more careful than the jabbed, but I can't see it.

[–] • 0 pt

I know. It's a mitigation theraputic at best. But the side effects are kind of nasty.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Sounds like a flu shot. 40% effective some years