The thing most people hate about the nature argument is the removal of free will. I mean if everything is programmed into your DNA including all the choices you are likely to make did you have any free will?
Many people wouldn't. Some might have a genetic sequence that allows them to break their programming however.
The thing most people hate about the nature argument is the removal of free will. I mean if everything is programmed into your DNA including all the choices you are likely to make did you have any free will?
Many people wouldn't. Some might have a genetic sequence that allows them to break their programming however.
Both people and computers can make choices, to act based on the input or the sensory inputs. What makes it so that one has free will and the other does not?
Both people and computers can make choices, to act based on the input or the sensory inputs. What makes it so that one has free will and the other does not?
(post is archived)