WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

920

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

The whole "diseased blanket" thing is just a way to blame whites for something whites had no control over, and didn't really know anything about. How could whites have known that Indians would be so susceptible to European diseases? And what could they have done about it, even if they had known? The left is determined to find malicious forethought where there was none.

[–] 0 pt

By 1700 the damage was done. Also native populations as a whole are higher now, as a whole than they were in pre-Columbian times.

[–] 0 pt

same thing in Australia. apparently we planned to genocide the aboriginals, but never did, so they then try to pretend the policy of taking half caste kids from their communities to educate them was somehow a genocide. of course it doesn't stand under the slightest bit of scrutiny, but it purposely never receives any scrutiny. the Aus govt felt they had a responsibility for half white kids, and in aboriginal communities the abuse was horrific. it still is today but back then it was commonplace for them to murder every 2nd infant, rape 100% of them, mutilate their genitalia, etc. the worst shit you can imagine. they first tried to bring the education to them to help them through christ, but the abos killed the nuns and missionaries, so eventually the govt decided on a more forceful policy, which actually worked, because when those kids returned home from boarding school they were more amenable to civilisation and less barbaric, although maybe that's just cause they were half white. aboriginal rural communities still routinely burn the free housing they are given to the ground to this day. like, not just one family.. entire small towns are built by the govt for outback abos to live in, and they burn the whole thing, one by one in quick succession usually by making their cooking fire on the floor, and then the cycle repeats. it's a massive scam on the taxpayer.

oh and whilst jews and their white liberal slaves love to somehow blame Christianity for a genocide that wasn't a genocide of stealing kids (our atheist govts not only still do this today, they have a far lower tolerance of abuse, and by their policies 100% of abo kids would've been taken from their 'parents') and then apparently having pedo orgies with them, it's only because of the pussy charitable christians that an actual genocide of vengeance didn't play out. so they get accused of the very thing they prevented. but that's a very common recurring theme in jewish rewrites of colonialism.

[–] [deleted] 0 pt (edited )

I can read this stuff all day. It just sounds true. Their versions never sound true

[–] 0 pt

Wait really?! Thats all the fucking evidence of it? Was it a jew diary?!

Not sure the year really but it was a guy saying that his commanding officer mentioned possibly giving the many sick blankets to the Indians. Maybe as a joke. Maybe as an idea. Thats all that happened. Now we just pretend we killed millions that way

[–] 0 pt
[–] 0 pt (edited )

Redacted

[–] 1 pt

Lmao. Wrong post ye have, but was just reading that one.

This? https://www.umass.edu/legal/derrico/amherst/lord_jeff.html

Same they don't talk about WHY Europeans hated the savages so much. No matter how many peace deals and treaties they made with the savages they kept committing atrocities....

I'm saving this one. "These letters also discuss the use of dogs to hunt the Indians, the so-called "Spaniard's Method," which Amherst approves in principle, but says he cannot implement because there are not enough dogs. In a letter dated 26 July 1763, Bouquet acknowledges Amherst's approval and writes, "all your Directions will be observed."