People naturally pay attention to things that are a threat, or make them fearful. That's the problem. Because no open minded research was done previously, they take the easy way, i.e. put on the mask and try not to be noticed, hoping it would pass, and dig in their heels on their ideas out of panic. People are generally intellectually lazy. They would rather post, comment or read twitter or tiktok for validation even when they are in a respected profession. How many people join medicine for altruistic reasons? Most are lab nerds who want money and aren't willing to do the ass kissing the pursuit of grant money entails. They usually won't do anything against the flow unless it's underhanded, or they are the point man on the team. They give the shots even knowing it's bullshit. They drown patients in chemo knowing it's bullshit. Think about that.
That is an astute analysis.
In on paragraph you kind of pulled out the one thread that is interesting to people: things things that are a threat.
Are we missing the golden opportunity on our side?
Your post made me think about why I spend time on this stuff. I guess the hook for me is the identification of the threats to our (my) existence.
If we were to start re-branding and re-packaging our signalling and messaging. How would you do it?
Just curious, your insight is amazing.
(post is archived)