Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.1K

Americans love the idea of freedom. That's the whole point.

But we have to accept reality that most, meaning over %50 of people, don't care and are actually sheep willing to be herded, and wanting to be herded and or lead.

If we wish to win the war against tyranny, we must know what winning looks like and have some new system in mind to prevent socialism from rearing it's head again, or we will end up right back where we are today.

we must also get comfortable with the idea of imposing these rules of whatever new structure we put into place at the expense of others liberty. Yes that will mean becoming a bit like those we hope to fight against right now. We must be willing to abandon that moral high ground white people love to try to be on all the time.

The goal cannot be a return to normal, because as we have seen, normal is a system that can turn into an attempt at white replacement. Some Americans still need to come to terms with that concept. Not just intellectually, but emotionally. We need to really feel the truth and weight of it.

Americans love the idea of freedom. That's the whole point. But we have to accept reality that most, meaning over %50 of people, don't care and are actually sheep willing to be herded, and wanting to be herded and or lead. If we wish to win the war against tyranny, we must know what winning looks like and have some new system in mind to prevent socialism from rearing it's head again, or we will end up right back where we are today. we must also get comfortable with the idea of imposing these rules of whatever new structure we put into place at the expense of others liberty. Yes that will mean becoming a bit like those we hope to fight against right now. We must be willing to abandon that moral high ground white people love to try to be on all the time. The goal cannot be a return to normal, because as we have seen, normal is a system that can turn into an attempt at white replacement. Some Americans still need to come to terms with that concept. Not just intellectually, but emotionally. We need to really feel the truth and weight of it.

(post is archived)

[–] • 2 pts (edited )

We had just authoritarianism at the beginning. There was always a powerful list of unilateral "thou shalt nots" built into the federal and each state constitution. We just allowed the definition of treason to be altered, along with many other vital terms. The kike is winning because he controls the lexicon. And because he won the Civil War.

A 100% redo would work perfectly (assuming we didn't lose a war) as long as the originally assumed conditions that the US was for white Christians and that women did not vote are upheld with violence.

Violent authoritarianism is the only meaningful moral high ground. As long as the authority is wielded within its appropriate jurisdictions. There can be no liberty, as we used to define it, without the shield of authoritarianism to guard it.

[–] • 2 pts

BS. Your 'over 50%' are in only about 5 states and NOT the voice of the United States and The Republic. The Bill of Rights are not rights given to Americans, they are Restrictions on OUR Gov. that shall NOT be infringed under penalty of Treason.

[–] • 0 pt

YEAH I AM PRETTY FUCKING FAR FROM OK RIGHT NOW

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=65F6lRdUU_c

I say we invoke the laws of eight and call the bluff of D.C.

When the US dollar fails to buy things. Look for a king and you shall find me.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

I've been sitting on this thought for quite awhile as well.

But we have to accept reality that most, meaning over %50 of people, don't care and are actually sheep willing to be herded, and wanting to be herded and or lead.

Not only this, but we also have to accept that the majority of the population is just too fucking stupid to handle liberty. We started out with liberty. Over time, little by little, generation after generation, fucking idiots do something incredibly stupid with that liberty and the result is almost always the removal of said liberty. Not mitigation of stupidity, just removal of freedoms for everyone. Liberties and freedoms do not come back once removed from a society, generally speaking.

Want to suggest a tiered system based on IQ and character... to keep idiots in check. But of course, that would system just be abused eventually, like everything else.

[–] • 1 pt

I think it would be interesting to see what would happen if the right to vote was reserved for those who volunteered to pay an income tax.

and if any social handout programs even exist under that system, no one who is receiving gov money or is an employee of the government should be allowed to vote for conflict of interest purposes.

I don't know, but yes, the sheep will need to be shamelessly herded. We need cultural leadership in some strong form.