Are you one of the this-virus-doesn't-exist people, or one of the no-virus-exists people? If you are one of the no-virus-exists people, we cannot discuss because our knowledge of science comes from different centuries. If you are one of the this-virus-doesn't-exist people, then please explain how the machines from Illumina and BMG that routinely isolate and sequence all viruses in labs produce invalid results for SARS-like viruses but are working fine for all other viruses.
(((illumina)))
Thanks for making this easy you subversive kike. https://poal.co/s/CoronaVirus/412984
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7092803/ = https://archive.md/7O6dv
ctrl + f "Illumina" to go to that specific snippet
Now I understand why so many call you a fag - as soon as you run out of arguments, you hide and answers with downvotes instead. Oh, I know, it's not your fault, it's (((them))) who did it to you.
These are the machines used for sequencing (like https://www.illumina.com/systems/sequencing-platforms/nextseq-1000-2000.html and https://www.bmglabtech.com/de/next-generation-sequencing-why-quantifying-exact-dna-rna-is-important). So you think (((viruses))) are not real because (((machines))) sequence them?
Btw., you avoided to answer my question: How comes that the machines can sequence some viruses, but create invalid results when sequencing others?
It's a feature not a bug
Go back to Reddit!
(post is archived)