WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

899

Biden quickly activated security forces, if I remember, the national guard, and also FEMA... to evacuate cities affected by the hurricanes in Kentucky, Arkansas and Illinois, the "help" is the excuse of these tyrants. The most the government could do is give hammers, nails, sledgehammers, saws and hoes (tool) for the population to learn to solve their own problems in these situations.

I don't trust anyone who looks nice and wants to help, be it the government, corporations, Red Cross, Rotary and Lions Club, etc.

Biden quickly activated security forces, if I remember, the national guard, and also FEMA... to evacuate cities affected by the hurricanes in Kentucky, Arkansas and Illinois, the "help" is the excuse of these tyrants. The most the government could do is give hammers, nails, sledgehammers, saws and hoes (tool) for the population to learn to solve their own problems in these situations. I don't trust anyone who looks nice and wants to help, be it the government, corporations, Red Cross, Rotary and Lions Club, etc.

(post is archived)

[–] 5 pts

The origin of government was people getting together to solve problems....

Then it got highjacked by jew

The solution ? keep IN government people that live in the municipality, country and HAVE CHILDREN

People withouth children do not know the many things that allow you to make wise decisions

[–] 0 pt

I'm not sure why you believe that was the origin of government. I've seen no evidence of that.

It's far more likely that government was simply the people who were able to use the most violence to enforce compliance among a group of people in a given geographic area.

And it's still the case today, except government wants to be appear to be legitimate because it has a population to control that is much larger than itself, so it controls the education system and the media in order to publish pro-government propaganda and keep people complacent and accepting of the warlord that controls them. Government also provides services that we all need, like police, courts, etc., but does so as a monopoly because competition would show people that government services are of extremely poor quality and way over-funded.

Government didn't get "hijacked [fixed your spelling] by [the] jew". Government was always a racket. The reason you believe what you do is because, like all of us, you have been subjected to pro-government propaganda from a very young age.

[–] 0 pt

Whatewer, free speech and propaganda is everywhere

If you need evidence for reality, you are a drone

Have a nice day

[–] 0 pt

That wasn't much of an argument, or really an argument at all.

You just assert that you're right and that because I disagree, I must be "a drone".

It's weird being called an NPC by an NPC, but I guess that's the world I'm living in.

[–] 0 pt

keep IN government people that live in the municipality, country and HAVE CHILDREN

Merkel didn't have children, explains a lot of her pro immigrant actions in the EU

[–] 4 pts (edited )

I'm against it being a static system that's automatically activated. If local communities want to have mutual aid agreements, fine. And that's fine up to the state level if they're specifically activated by state legislatures for each emergency separately with non-negotiable deadlines. Having it federally controlled and federally initiated is obviously intended to be expanded to whatever the Fed decodes is an "emergency" or a "public health crisis".

hurricane crisis

flooding crisis

pandemic

antisemitism

gun violence

domestic terrorism (i.e. homeschooling and its fruit)

[–] 1 pt (edited )

It's literally the government's duty to help in disaster situations.

fucking lolbertarians: "nooooooo gubbermint assistance is bad, they shouldn't help ANYONE".

[–] 0 pt

The government's place should primarily be protection and expansion of it's controlled territory, not to give "aid" to the populace.

[–] 1 pt

“I’m from the government and I’m here to help” Always false advertising

[–] 1 pt

To me, it seems morally correct for the government to help out in certain disaster situations. I share your distrust for all manner of government program and supposed non-profit organizations, but it's in our collective best interest as "united states" to stop the undue expansion of wildfires, mitigate flooding, and make sure people aren't stranded up shit creek. Obviously, it would be better if each state saved a reasonable amount in their emergency fund for whatever reoccurring natural disasters happen, but that shouldn't disqualify Congress or the President from voting to help on a case by case basis. In a perfect world, the government is composed of people, and people should look out for people. I know it doesn't goddamn work and that everyone we have has been bought and sold a long time ago, but that is how it's drawn out on parchment.

[–] 1 pt

I say this every time the Mississippi river floods or a hurricane hits Louisiana

[–] 0 pt

Take back what was stolen from you

[–] 0 pt

I think it's worse that the government steps in a prevents people from helping each other. Like they did with that civil navy that was responding to floods, being prevented from doing rescue operations by force.

[–] 0 pt

But look at how much the government helped during Katrina. There totally weren't a bunch of missing people afterward or wide lootings or anything, right? To be a little more serious though, there was footage of police literally stealing shit during Katrina.

Also, something something HAARP.

[–] 0 pt

You are as stupid as biden,NO hurricane has ever hit Kentucky.

[–] [deleted] -1 pt
[–] 1 pt

Yes,dumbell;you just linked me TORNADO damage,not HURRICANE damage,again NO HURRICANE has ever hit Kenfucky.

[–] 0 pt

Quite a few have through history, not recently though it's not uncommon.

[–] 0 pt

Not if I’m still paying taxes, they better do something.

Load more (2 replies)