eh, it depends on whose saying it. I imagine that if word got out that natural sugars processed more slowly and didn't give off the same cravings indicators from the brain... that the yearly 9 trillion dollar industry might take a significant hit.
I imagine that if word got out that natural sugars processed more slowly and didn't give off the same cravings indicators from the brain
That's not how it works. A molecule of fructose is a molecule of fructose. How it reacts with anything, including digestive enzymes, is dictated by its atomic composition and molecular structure. There cannot be two molecules of fructose that behave differently in the body because of how they came to be there. That's not how physics and chemistry work. That is the realm of magic.
You sound like some kind of kike gatekeeper for hersheys or pepsi co.
I won't bother linking the number of studies done that suggest that natural sugars burn differently and impact the brain differently as not only do you not want to know, you're actively speaking as though your opinion on it is fact.
Get fucked
You sound like some kind of kike gatekeeper for hersheys or pepsi co
You're here trying to propose that all of chemistry and physics is wrong.
I won't bother linking the number of studies done that suggest that natural sugars burn differently
HFCS is a natural sugar. So is cane sugar. There is no credible study showing that the same molecules behave differently depending on where they originate. It's literally not possible. All sugar is poison, whether bee vomit, cane sugar, or fruit juice.
You're allowing yourself to be fooled by people pedaling useless expensive shit because you don't understand the science. That's something only you can change.
(post is archived)