WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

767

I’ve already gone on a 20 minute rant about jewish power with two right leaning family members. They are listening. One of them said twice: “that can’t be right. Do you have a source?” And I had one handy for him. He wanted me to text him more information out of curiosity. Happy Thanksgiving!!

I’ve already gone on a 20 minute rant about jewish power with two right leaning family members. They are listening. One of them said twice: “that can’t be right. Do you have a source?” And I had one handy for him. He wanted me to text him more information out of curiosity. Happy Thanksgiving!!

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

I don't care about your need to be right.

That’s because you know you’re wrong.

Just admit that you conflated two concepts. It’s not hard. A source is NOT a person of merit.

You’re talking about two completely different things.

YOU started this argument by trying to pretend you weren’t wrong. All you had to do was say, “Oh, you’re right, there is a difference between asking for a source and appealing to authority.”

But instead you launched this retarded conversation where you try to mitigate the difference between “appealing to a person of authority,” and “Appeal to authority.”

They’re the same fucking thing and you’re a clown for being so embarrassed to admit that you misspoke.

[–] 0 pt

I didn't misspeak. I was never concerned with the fallacy. I was speaking about how to respond to it.

You might think I'll relent, but you don't seem to know me very well. You've got the wrong guy. Again, we're done here. Run along and play with your toys now, bud.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

I was never concerned with the fallacy. I was speaking about how to respond to it.

BUT THE GUY WAS TALKING ABOUT REQUESTING A SOURCE AND YOU RESPONDED TALKING ABOUT APPEALS TO AUTHORITY.

Do you get it? Or are you just flat retarded?

[–] 0 pt

I was talking about how to respond to it... I don't care about how right you desire to be.