Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

I’ve already gone on a 20 minute rant about jewish power with two right leaning family members. They are listening. One of them said twice: “that can’t be right. Do you have a source?” And I had one handy for him. He wanted me to text him more information out of curiosity. Happy Thanksgiving!!

I’ve already gone on a 20 minute rant about jewish power with two right leaning family members. They are listening. One of them said twice: “that can’t be right. Do you have a source?” And I had one handy for him. He wanted me to text him more information out of curiosity. Happy Thanksgiving!!

(post is archived)

[+] [deleted] • 11 pts
[–] • 5 pts

'did you know that trump said israel should rightfully control our congress?'

i bet 90% of right wingers still have no idea about this

[–] • 1 pt

I 100% believe Trump is a Zionist, but I’ve never heard of this comment. Have a source?

[–] • 1 pt
[–] • 0 pt

omfg you can't be serious. and you even post on forums like this! holy shit.

google it for yourself faggot instead of trying to get me to do it for you, it's not hidden.

[–] • 0 pt

And now Biden has a 100% stacked jew cabinet. Hard to believe he sucked more Jewish dick than Trump.

PS every single one of Bidens kids are married to jews and have kids with them.

Trump is just the more coherent less of two evils.

[–] • 2 pts

Trump is just the more coherent less of two evils.

That is a pretty scary statement.

[–] • 0 pt

Both were sell outs, trump i think actually believed americas alliance with israel was somehow beneficial and that the jews were genuinely interested in progressing america. He was fucking stupid for believing that and it bit him in the ass. Trump solving problems in the middle east that the jews never wanted solved was pretty funny, 'ISIS is a threat to israel!" ok lets shut them down "NOOOOooo You cant do that!" jews are the worst allies in existence.

[–] • 2 pts

You should email him the old "dO yOu HaVe A sOuRcE fOr ThAt?!" meme.

[–] • 4 pts

It's thought termination rhetoric designed to disrupt the flow of conversation. It uses consensus as its fuel. Ask them why that person is a figure of authority. When they explain why, ask them why someone else couldn't be an authority on the subject. Then dismantle the "degree" rhetoric, where groups of people approve someone being able to say they know things. Then you can work in to dismantling the academia in general and point out that science is still full of questions and that conse sus often holds us back and, in fact, we often make the biggest strides when it comes to deviance. Of course, you don't want to be a miserable twat no one wants to be around because you always start arguments, but this is for the sake of people thinking critically again, so it's important to choose these battles wisely.

[–] • 0 pt

You’re explaining appeal to authority. Requiring a source rather than just random words from a person you’re debating is not fallacious in the least

[–] • 0 pt

Well of course I am... I then detail ways in which you can undo that reliance. But I don't think I called it fallacious, did I?

[–] • 1 pt

Now come out to them as being gay for double XP

[–] • 1 pt

Now, build a mailing list so you can provide them all information to enable them to retain their power against the Jewish onslaught.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

Nice. So far this yeah I have red pilled my mom and two neighbors. It feels good.

[–] • 1 pt

Look, let me help you out here. First off, you should be asking what they know about the subject and not someone else. Tell them they shouldn't need sources if they aren't informed and if they are informed they should go figure it out and return later and remind you the reasons for which you're wrong. But reiterate that you're having a discussion right now and if that's going to continue, they're going to have to suspend disbelief and to humor you for the time being. If they don't know better and are unsure of whether to trust you without good reason, remind them that this means they're simply uninformed and learning more with or without you might be a good idea. Secondly, you want them to think they're the ones that thought of it. You don't tell them what's true. You appeal to curiosity:

Hey why do you suppose those guys with the big noses who cut off baby dicks were kicked out of over 100 countries?

This is where they ask you what you mean, you repeat it again and then they pause and remind themselves it's bad to be "anti-semetic" and say something about how that possibly isn't true. This is when you ask them, "okay, but is that false? Do you know? Have you ever looked in to it?" They'll inevitably repeat their disbelief or come back later (if they aren't just some junkie with a short memory) and say, "well, Snopes did this fact check and it said that's not true (or at least mostly untrue or whatever their "some part of that is wrong" bullshit), so I'm not sure I believe you." This is when you press them further and say," no seriously, what sources did they use and did you read the source material?" This is about the time they get annoyed, notice the brain block that stops them from thinking further and you get to pull up the source material with a smug grin or they decide you're toxic for making them think thoughts the black box with the pretty colors on it told them they aren't supposed to think. Optimally, they actually start to listen and it starts to set in and they begin to attempt to get to the bottom of it.

So, that was super long-winded, but it's more about you posing questions and showing them how to think critically. You don't show them how to do so by telling them certain information, but asking what they think about X and when they tell you asking them why they think they think that. Have you ever seen a super patient boomer talk to some retard, going super far out of their way to make a point? Or have you ever seen Jordan Peterson maneuver interviews that are loaded with gotcha questions? That's your aim.

[–] • 1 pt

I expected you to say "and I am ready to bury their corpses under the compost heap'. Well done, lad.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

tomorrow america_first_1776 gets vanned and eats Homeland Security turkey with patriots....

[–] • 0 pt

Ann Franks diary was written by someone else after ww2