It is common to try to justify yourself as sane to add weight to your arguments in a sane society. After all, if you are crazy and disjointed from reality or logic, why should anyone listen to your conclusions? But people make the mistake of thinking this pattern carries over to an insane society, and they waste a lot of effort running in loops trying to chase the infeasable often as a preliminary to truly expressing themselves and their message.
Many of these people in minor positions like school board member, and even many in major positions, are not people you have a responsibility to reason with. They openly admit to wanting a reduction in the ethnic group that represents the majority in this country and act like you are insane or dangerous for opposing it. That's genocide. That's openly genocide. It's the actual textbook definition. And they will call you insane for labeling it as such despite that being as close to the textbook definition you can get. They will never concede your sanity in speaking the truth because to do so would be to self indict themselves as exactly what they are and what you claim. It would be suicide on their part to concede the sanity of a sane person.
That is not to say that the solution is to move past reason. But it is important to note who is worth trying to get on the same page with. It is completely reasonable to try to get on the same page as someone you disagree with or even someone you don't think is currently rational, but people who are seeking your distruction from a position of authority and attempt to gaslight you by calling you insane are not people to waste energy justifying yourself to them. If you find yourself before them waste zero time trying to establish yourself before them. Give them your message. Communication with them should be unidirectional. Absolutely refuse to consider the arguments of the insane. Their words are a wind moving past your ears, and society would be benefited if that was the case for all people. They want you to be ignored but the sooner we all ignored them and wrote them off as too unhinged to listen to the better.
Another way of looking at it is that it is normal for people in society to collectively negotiate with one another what is reasonable and what sanity is. Letting them be a part of that negotiation is a mistake.
It is common to try to justify yourself as sane to add weight to your arguments in a sane society. After all, if you are crazy and disjointed from reality or logic, why should anyone listen to your conclusions? But people make the mistake of thinking this pattern carries over to an insane society, and they waste a lot of effort running in loops trying to chase the infeasable often as a preliminary to truly expressing themselves and their message.
Many of these people in minor positions like school board member, and even many in major positions, are not people you have a responsibility to reason with. They openly admit to wanting a reduction in the ethnic group that represents the majority in this country and act like you are insane or dangerous for opposing it. That's genocide. That's openly genocide. It's the actual textbook definition. And they will call you insane for labeling it as such despite that being as close to the textbook definition you can get. They will never concede your sanity in speaking the truth because to do so would be to self indict themselves as exactly what they are and what you claim. It would be suicide on their part to concede the sanity of a sane person.
That is not to say that the solution is to move past reason. But it is important to note who is worth trying to get on the same page with. It is completely reasonable to try to get on the same page as someone you disagree with or even someone you don't think is currently rational, but people who are seeking your distruction from a position of authority and attempt to gaslight you by calling you insane are not people to waste energy justifying yourself to them. If you find yourself before them waste zero time trying to establish yourself before them. Give them your message. Communication with them should be unidirectional. Absolutely refuse to consider the arguments of the insane. Their words are a wind moving past your ears, and society would be benefited if that was the case for all people. They want you to be ignored but the sooner we all ignored them and wrote them off as too unhinged to listen to the better.
Another way of looking at it is that it is normal for people in society to collectively negotiate with one another what is reasonable and what sanity is. Letting them be a part of that negotiation is a mistake.
(post is archived)