> I dont think anyone understands whats at stake here. Nothing is beneath these cunts, they were developing bioweapons and released them against civilian populations. No, some of us do understand. Some of us are still debating whether the mass death of liberals from deadly vaccines is in fact a real life advantage in the long run. Thats a pretty ghoulish calculation all things considered, but we're talking about the survival of the west here. Liberalism is a real life mental disorder, and political idealogies are primarily genetic. Which would mean, just assuming it really is depopulation, and there isn't any reason to think its not at this point, and its **not** a scheme to remove the bulk of the herd, rather than innoculate the useful idiots against anthrax/ebola/etc and then use biowarfare to eliminate us unjabbed--assuming all that, then the result is massively in our favor, and pro-eugenic. The open questions for some is 1. is it really about eliminating the herd? 2. maybe its about normalizing mass mandatory vaccination? 3. and then getting to control *which* demographics, year over year, are stealth sterilized by selective vaccination programs targetted genetically and geographically? The way I see it, its too big a series of "maybes" and hopium to leave as a decision for the internationalists, when they can and will use it at some point against us, either as a new normal to weaponize against everyone, or as a new way to control nations to their benefit (slavery). If we allow the public to be coerced into jabs, or even *choose*, then the public in turn will be used to normalize, and then force mandatory jabs on everyone else. And we absolutely shouldn't allow that to happen if it is in our power to prevent.