Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.1K

Someone at church told me i was destructively generous. the reason for it is two fold, or really two examples

i gave away around 2500 bullets to a bunch of church members. i didn't particularly feel bad about it, i just have a life philosophy that everyone should be armed and have bullets for their guns. i didn't ask for money back or payment for said bullets, i just don't see ammo and guns as an item that has to be restricted, especially in these trying times.

my old tenants were looking to buy the house i owned. it had an appraisal price of around 550,000, and i had originally bought it for around 450,000, and i'm selling it at around 415,000. so i technically lost money on the sale, when you account for how much i paid for it. however, there is more insidiousness to the madness. part of me has a hypothesis that by intentionally under bidding my house to someone, it will force the appraisals of the local area down, and eventually cause a housing pop, so to speak.

in both cases my reasoning is very calculated, i guess people are just not used to see someone who doesn't just take the cash and run anymore

Someone at church told me i was destructively generous. the reason for it is two fold, or really two examples i gave away around 2500 bullets to a bunch of church members. i didn't particularly feel bad about it, i just have a life philosophy that everyone should be armed and have bullets for their guns. i didn't ask for money back or payment for said bullets, i just don't see ammo and guns as an item that has to be restricted, especially in these trying times. my old tenants were looking to buy the house i owned. it had an appraisal price of around 550,000, and i had originally bought it for around 450,000, and i'm selling it at around 415,000. so i technically lost money on the sale, when you account for how much i paid for it. however, there is more insidiousness to the madness. part of me has a hypothesis that by intentionally under bidding my house to someone, it will force the appraisals of the local area down, and eventually cause a housing pop, so to speak. in both cases my reasoning is very calculated, i guess people are just not used to see someone who doesn't just take the cash and run anymore

(post is archived)

[–] • 3 pts

You sound like a fed

[–] • 1 pt

No gun owner calls ammo "bullets"

[–] • 0 pt

Can u send me a pizza?

[–] • 0 pt

Give me £1 million.

[–] • 0 pt

If you were someone I was affiliated with outside of the digital world, I would berate you for making such abysmal financial decisions. But since you're retarded and generous to a fault, please, please do not fuck with shitcoins. You will pay for villages across India to not poo in loo for years to come and become bewildered about all of the money you get scammed out of.

[–] • 0 pt

The way I see it, charging too much for a house in this market is price gouging, and I don't partake in gouging. Sure, I could have asked for more money and been a complete jew about it, but to what end? According to Mark 8:36

“For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?”

That house is only worth what the completely kiked market has decided, and priced out everyone else in the process. I mean, at its appraisal price, I would have to live with the fact a rich California liberal would most likely move in, which I simply can't bear