If you freely feed poors you get more even poorers. See Africa.
If you freely feed poors you get more even poorers. See Africa.
The issue with Africa is that Africans have zero IQ.
Free food would actually benefit a developed society from increasing morale and reducing stress, leading to more productivity.
The issue with Africa is that Africans have zero IQ.
Free food would actually benefit a developed society from increasing morale and reducing stress, leading to more productivity.
So free food is only beneficial for a society of high IQs, a society which does not exist, ergo free food is in reality an accelerant of poors.
So free food is only beneficial for a society of high IQs, a society which does not exist, ergo free food is in reality an accelerant of poors.
Only if it makes the poors more productive.
Only if it makes the poors more productive.
There is no such thing as free. Somebody is paying for that food, and it's consumers who pay the markup on food they buy to cover the food they don't. Giving away anything without charge doesn't benefit anybody except the one doing the giving since they now have a axe to hold over the recipient's head.
There is no such thing as free. Somebody is paying for that food, and it's consumers who pay the markup on food they buy to cover the food they don't. Giving away anything without charge doesn't benefit anybody except the one doing the giving since they now have a axe to hold over the recipient's head.
(post is archived)