Don's mentor was Roy Cohn. Documents were declassified when Don entered office. He saw the depth of Israeli involvement in 9/11. He's been recorded at least once saying they murdered hundreds of his friends. Don grew up around "jews" in NY. He knows how to game them. How else was he allowed in to the preside trial office despite the entire Legacy Media being deployed against him? So he was entirely owned by "jews", who also own the media, but they couldn't stop attacking him for the last seven years? Why did they try to impeach him if they own him? Why didn't they unveil more dirt than he fucked a hooker, has a mushroom dick, he's orange and he thinks his daughter is hot? If he's owned by big nose, why did he wear the talit? If he's owned by "jews" so much, why were he and Bernie at odds? How do you think Orthodox Jews, who are very, very conservative, feel about his gay son in law? Why did Bannon and Trump's selected intelligence club ally with supposed "antisemites" online if he's owned by "jews"? Zionism is simply noiZ, noise. Zionism is bullshit. International "jewry" is merely Rothschild control masquerading as big nose infestation. This is why the Rothschilds created Israel with the English government, to establish a home base in the Middle East. They use "jews" as pawns. They call the citizens of big nose land dogs. You aren't trying. You're repeating talking points crafted by Israeli intelligence services. As for Ron, he did sort of expose himself in the Ben & Jerry's debacle. Here's the situation though: Middle Eastern influence has permeated US politics. The Republicans went with the Israeli side, considering them the lesser of two evils. Israel trains a lot of the police forces and are a big reason for the militarization of PDs. Look at DynCorp as an example. So the Police State is thereby a Rothschild-inspired condition. The Democrats went with MB: Obama, Awan, Jarrett, Wasserman-Schultz, Abedin, etc. So Saud. Yes, there is a "jewish" influence in US politics, but you guys explain these things so poorly that it gives the wrong impression. It's not accurate enough. People could get so much more if they better understood the nuance and didn't rely on mantras about obsessions with "jews". When you stare so much at them, you miss Catholics/Jesuits, you miss the faggots with aprons, Tavistock, CFR, Shrines and Jesters, S&B, the odd pagan cults you wouldn't understand even if I explained the basics of, you miss ethnic cartels/mobs, you miss all of the different orders, the I the think tanks and NGOs, you miss military orgs like MOS or GCHQ. I don't think you're here for honest reasons or you're just a dullard. What you're doing is child's play. You're doing this to fit in. It's too bad you're repeating talking points crafted to design division and demoralization.