Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.1K
• (edited )
The Class Question

There are plenty of Race Realists here, but there is little talk about the class-based differences in genetics. We omit the factor of class when it comes to inventions and achievements- of course, they could not have done it without the efforts of the lower/ middle classes, in that way, it was a team effort, but let's be honest, they were mostly dragged into it by the circumstances forced upon them. Just like we are forced to contribute to a system that actively despises us now.

Aristocracy: taken from "aristos" meaning "best of its kind, noblest, bravest, most virtuous." It was a political system designed with the understanding that notable men of noble qualities would pass on those superior qualities to their descendants. It was understood that if they lead society the qualities that their progenitors exhibited would also be reflected in the nation they led. But the descendants of those aristocracies became spoilt, spiteful and out of touch with reality, they betrayed their nations by siding with Jews and mixing their bloodlines with them, like the Royal family having Rothschild blood for instance. Creating plenty of "Winston Churchills." Nietzsche was a factor in that, he promoted such mixing and asserted that the Jews were eugenic, and posed no threat to European nations, whereas anti-Semites were irrational savages.

“The society that separates its scholars from its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting done by fools.” - Thucydides

Still, when I look at the absolute state of Britain, the Lower Classes are mostly shameless in their lack of positive qualities, and they seem possessed by the urge to spread their corruption to other individuals and even resent those who resist.

There are plenty of Race Realists here, but there is little talk about the class-based differences in genetics. We omit the factor of class when it comes to inventions and achievements- of course, they could not have done it without the efforts of the lower/ middle classes, in that way, it was a team effort, but let's be honest, they were mostly dragged into it by the circumstances forced upon them. Just like we are forced to contribute to a system that actively despises us now. Aristocracy: taken from "aristos" meaning "best of its kind, noblest, bravest, most virtuous." It was a political system designed with the understanding that notable men of noble qualities would pass on those superior qualities to their descendants. It was understood that if they lead society the qualities that their progenitors exhibited would also be reflected in the nation they led. But the descendants of those aristocracies became spoilt, spiteful and out of touch with reality, they betrayed their nations by siding with Jews and mixing their bloodlines with them, like the Royal family having Rothschild blood for instance. Creating plenty of "Winston Churchills." Nietzsche was a factor in that, he promoted such mixing and asserted that the Jews were eugenic, and posed no threat to European nations, whereas anti-Semites were irrational savages. “The society that separates its scholars from its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting done by fools.” - Thucydides Still, when I look at the absolute state of Britain, the Lower Classes are mostly shameless in their lack of positive qualities, and they seem possessed by the urge to spread their corruption to other individuals and even resent those who resist.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (21).
[–] [deleted] • 0 pt (edited )

I deleted a portion and forgot to replace it, no wonder it sounds nonsensical.

Ok, if you uphold truth as a cause, it's no good clinging to half-truths, because some people apply equality to differences within race, rather than admitting that there is also hierarchy within race. What you can apply to race, that a people are the product of their ancestors choices, desires, habits, over generations multiplied, over thousands of years, can also be applied, in a less severe scale, to class.

Secondly, admitting there is hierarchy lends itself to some kind of class-based system, but we need to learn from past mistakes. Having the society so split, in various ways, like living standard, led to the higher classes becoming completely alienated from their own nations, seeing them as disposable pawns. Higher standards of living are a great motivator in capitalism, to keep people turning their wheels, chasing the money, but back in the days of aristocracy, it was purely selfish and it was self destructive in the sense that it led to culminating weakness & cowardice as well as envy & indignation from the people supporting their weight.

But the Lower Classes are disgusting. Especially in Britain. I find it hard to see ways to improve that.

So there are three things there to discuss if you feel so inclined.

[–] • 0 pt

>But the Lower Classes are disgusting. Especially in Britain. I find it hard to see ways to improve that.

Eugenics and cultural revival. Hitler turned around the Weimar decadence into a proud and capable group of warriors and inventors within a few short years. People with no hope of doing anything good with their lives will just turn to hedonism. Inspire them and they can do wonders.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

If it was just hedonism, but they seem to lack the sensibilities that would lead to them being inspired by such a thing. Evidently, enough Germans in the cities, back then, did not lack those sensibilities.

[–] • 0 pt

But no one has come along with a good chance of success there. If someone did I'm sure many would flock to his banner. It's a bit of a chicken or egg problem, but Britain has lacked strong characters. America had George Lincoln Rockwell but he was assassinated.