Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

741
• (edited )
The Class Question

There are plenty of Race Realists here, but there is little talk about the class-based differences in genetics. We omit the factor of class when it comes to inventions and achievements- of course, they could not have done it without the efforts of the lower/ middle classes, in that way, it was a team effort, but let's be honest, they were mostly dragged into it by the circumstances forced upon them. Just like we are forced to contribute to a system that actively despises us now.

Aristocracy: taken from "aristos" meaning "best of its kind, noblest, bravest, most virtuous." It was a political system designed with the understanding that notable men of noble qualities would pass on those superior qualities to their descendants. It was understood that if they lead society the qualities that their progenitors exhibited would also be reflected in the nation they led. But the descendants of those aristocracies became spoilt, spiteful and out of touch with reality, they betrayed their nations by siding with Jews and mixing their bloodlines with them, like the Royal family having Rothschild blood for instance. Creating plenty of "Winston Churchills." Nietzsche was a factor in that, he promoted such mixing and asserted that the Jews were eugenic, and posed no threat to European nations, whereas anti-Semites were irrational savages.

“The society that separates its scholars from its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting done by fools.” - Thucydides

Still, when I look at the absolute state of Britain, the Lower Classes are mostly shameless in their lack of positive qualities, and they seem possessed by the urge to spread their corruption to other individuals and even resent those who resist.

There are plenty of Race Realists here, but there is little talk about the class-based differences in genetics. We omit the factor of class when it comes to inventions and achievements- of course, they could not have done it without the efforts of the lower/ middle classes, in that way, it was a team effort, but let's be honest, they were mostly dragged into it by the circumstances forced upon them. Just like we are forced to contribute to a system that actively despises us now. Aristocracy: taken from "aristos" meaning "best of its kind, noblest, bravest, most virtuous." It was a political system designed with the understanding that notable men of noble qualities would pass on those superior qualities to their descendants. It was understood that if they lead society the qualities that their progenitors exhibited would also be reflected in the nation they led. But the descendants of those aristocracies became spoilt, spiteful and out of touch with reality, they betrayed their nations by siding with Jews and mixing their bloodlines with them, like the Royal family having Rothschild blood for instance. Creating plenty of "Winston Churchills." Nietzsche was a factor in that, he promoted such mixing and asserted that the Jews were eugenic, and posed no threat to European nations, whereas anti-Semites were irrational savages. “The society that separates its scholars from its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting done by fools.” - Thucydides Still, when I look at the absolute state of Britain, the Lower Classes are mostly shameless in their lack of positive qualities, and they seem possessed by the urge to spread their corruption to other individuals and even resent those who resist.

(post is archived)

[–] • 1 pt

I don't disagree with anything you've said, but I also don't see the point you're making. What's the insight here?

[–] • 0 pt

My takeaway was that while IQ / crime / degeneracy are heavily linked to race, decades and centuries of exposure to crime and degeneracy via low-class / trash culture or conditions brings down the less malignant races to the level of the lowest common denominator.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt (edited )

The culture encourages the mentalities of the lowest common denominator by defending them from criticism or correction. The political regime of Bio-Leninism and the media constantly encouraging degenerative qualities whilst shaming positive qualities is the most monolithic part of the problem. But aside from the media or (((foreign influences))), I mean the individual to individual kind of corruption, where they actively pursue tearing others down to their level, and then get angry at "boring snobs" who don't engage in the same shit as them, whether it's being a wigger or something like that. They don't even consider what reasons someone may have, it's just an impulsive response because they feel insecure about it.

You know when parents used to say "those friends are a bad influence on you"- Well, there are trashy White people out there who are constantly looking for isolated, vulnerable people to 'befriend' but only for selfish purposes, but they then make those vulnerable people just as bad as they are, even if they were never like that before. Their character & mentality rubs off on the impressionable & lonely and they enable all the shitty behaviour that was always enabled in them. But if they can't use them for those selfish purposes, they have no problem in being cruel towards them.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt (edited )

I deleted a portion and forgot to replace it, no wonder it sounds nonsensical.

Ok, if you uphold truth as a cause, it's no good clinging to half-truths, because some people apply equality to differences within race, rather than admitting that there is also hierarchy within race. What you can apply to race, that a people are the product of their ancestors choices, desires, habits, over generations multiplied, over thousands of years, can also be applied, in a less severe scale, to class.

Secondly, admitting there is hierarchy lends itself to some kind of class-based system, but we need to learn from past mistakes. Having the society so split, in various ways, like living standard, led to the higher classes becoming completely alienated from their own nations, seeing them as disposable pawns. Higher standards of living are a great motivator in capitalism, to keep people turning their wheels, chasing the money, but back in the days of aristocracy, it was purely selfish and it was self destructive in the sense that it led to culminating weakness & cowardice as well as envy & indignation from the people supporting their weight.

But the Lower Classes are disgusting. Especially in Britain. I find it hard to see ways to improve that.

So there are three things there to discuss if you feel so inclined.

[–] • 0 pt

>But the Lower Classes are disgusting. Especially in Britain. I find it hard to see ways to improve that.

Eugenics and cultural revival. Hitler turned around the Weimar decadence into a proud and capable group of warriors and inventors within a few short years. People with no hope of doing anything good with their lives will just turn to hedonism. Inspire them and they can do wonders.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

If it was just hedonism, but they seem to lack the sensibilities that would lead to them being inspired by such a thing. Evidently, enough Germans in the cities, back then, did not lack those sensibilities.

[–] • 0 pt

Would you like to know the Story of the Kenzo and the Nigger?

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

am I going to like this story?

[–] • 0 pt

Depends on what sort of stories you like.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Idk, is Kenzo a samurai? All I know about this story is that it's about a Nigger.

[–] • 0 pt

If you're not from a rich family you're supposed to live trying to make one: capitalism has ladders, beauty and backdoors for class mobility. (This includes literal lotteries so even no hopers see hope.) Also class (social power) has become more of a social construct than a hereditary one. Few examples, People marry for status etc and tend to strive to give their offspring the things which they themselves went without (generational inprovement); class can birth sabotage in the form of wreckless lowlifes like hunter Biden. Anyway you get the picture and areas to think about.

Maybe class is a more important game to the white players though because of their genetics, culture and historical experience. With the waves of new multi-culti-cuckoos career seeking it seems that a lot want the materials reaped from being high class, not to be "high class". Maybe think about that as well

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt (edited )

There is a hereditary level to it, It's like parallel 'pools' that mostly didn't crossover much, and went through different selection pressures. I'm talking about over a long period of time though, not just a few generations. But is that an issue, like does it impact their genetic inheritance significantly? Or is it actually mostly just a problem of nurture?

(This includes literal lotteries so even no hopers see hope.)

When Lower Class win Lotteries, they tend to splurge it all, so it's a very temporary affair.

I'm sure there's a lot more class mobility in America, but it seems like the real class system isn't the official one, when I look at how much wealth 1% own in comparison to everyone else. I don't like romanticisation of Capitalism or Plutocracy because the system offers no defence against the challenges that put us in this situation. Although I don't really want to argue about that here.

class can birth sabotage in the form of wreckless lowlifes like hunter Biden. Anyway you get the picture and areas to think about.

I already covered this self-sabotage.

Maybe class is a more important game to the white players though because of their genetics, culture and historical experience. With the waves of new multi-culti-cuckoos career seeking it seems that a lot want the materials reaped from being high class, not to be "high class". Maybe think about that as well

Is this a new tangent? Well, the Indians have a caste system, their higher castes are somewhat more European in admixture. The East Asians also have phenotypes that are associated with nobility. So there is more genetic disparity between classes elsewhere than in European nations. I'm not sure what you mean by the latter sentence.

[–] • 0 pt

Good comment. Yes that's what I was saying, that capitalism has disrupted natural class. Sure there are a lot of gatekeepers, but a random pauper can escape poverty and consequently climb the new perception of class by throwing a football or singing etc. Fake it til u make it.

The last paragraph I wrote was in the context of multiculturalism and how the influx of various cultures seems to dilute the instinctual recognition of class in the land hosting it. All the races have different class structures to serve different purposes, but all we see is the imitation of white class as outsiders insert themselves into white cultural roles. For instance, all Indians in white land are Indians, we dont see the expensive shirts on one and think WOW, instead we may think "you cant polish a turd". Look at the 'doctors' who want to be 'doctors' in a first world country instead of their own. Conversely, picture a load of white guys entering the jungle and running ayahuasca retreats as shaman vs the native jungle folk doing it. It's just not respected as legit. Class boils down to authenticity, a form of hypnotic social agreement.

Class requires certain expectations to be met and must incorporate exclusion. The foundation of the current invasion is not built on this, neither is marxism/CRT

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

all Indians in white land are Indians

Oh yeah, for sure, it's something that is only really recognised internally.